Prognostic characterization in the initial assessment of patients with advanced cancer disease is an essential step to plan the most appropriate therapeutic program. Since clinical prediction of survival (CPS) may be of limited value, some authors have tried to integrate specific prognostic factors into prognostic multidimensional scores. We carried out a prospective cohort study in two palliative care units to compare the accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score, the Objective Prognostic Score (OPS), and the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI). In addition, we compared the accuracy of the CPS independently estimated by different healthcare professionals and we tested the role of laboratory results, together with clinical and social factors in predicting survival. Clinical and laboratory data of 334 advanced cancer patients were prospectively collected from the time of in-hospital admission. PaP Score was the most accurate index of survival prediction, followed by PPI; CPS estimates' accuracy was similar among physicians and nurse. All healthcare professionals tended to underestimate the real survival. Integrating CPS with multidimensional indexes may further improve the patient's management. The degree of autonomy and the number of metastatic sites were independent prognostic factors for 30-days mortality and overall survival in multivariate analysis.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality and after acute infection, HBV infection can persist in about 1-2% of immunocompetent hosts. Chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression can lead to HBV reactivation and may cause discontinuation of anticancer treatment, fulminant hepatitis with liver failure and death. During immunosuppressive treatments such as chemotherapy, reactivation of HBV infection is a life-threatening complication that can occur in HBV active or inactive carriers but also in patients with OBI. Occult HBV infection (OBI) is defined as the presence of detectable very low levels of HBV DNA in HBsAg-negative patients. Many literature data showed a benefit from prophylactic antiviral treatment in cancer patients at risk for HBV reactivation, however there is no evidence in determining the benefit of routine screening for chronic HBV infection in all patients undergoing cytotoxic and immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Major guidelines recommend HBV screening in HBV-infection high risk patients or if the immunosuppression caused by the treatment is expected to be high.

Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer in women of reproductive age. In young women, chemotherapy may induce amenorrhea: it is still uncertain how to assess menopausal status in these patients despite the importance of its definition for choosing appropriate endocrine treatment. In the development of sensitive biomarkers for fertility and ovarian reserve, anti-Mü llerian hormone (AMH) is considered a promising marker of ovarian reserve. The clearest data regarding a clinical use of AMH are related to the measurement of the ovarian pool in women who undergo IVF: the available data, also in breast cancer patients, seem to suggest that AMH measurement, before gonadotropin administration, can be a useful marker for the prediction of women at risk for poor-response or no response to ovarian stimulation. The utility of AMH as a potential marker of chemotherapy-induced ovarian follicular depletion and an early plasma marker of chemotherapy-induced gonadal damage has been evaluated both in young women after treatment for cancer in childhood and in young survivors of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Several studies have demonstrated a potential utility of AMH, inhibin, or follicle-stimulating factor as biomarkers predicting infertility risk in breast cancer patients, but the studies conducted so far are not conclusive. Further studies are needed in order to define the regimen-specific action of chemotherapy on AMH levels, the percentage of post-treatment recovery of plasma levels of the hormone, and the relationship between menopausal status and AMH.

No abstract

The mechanism of action of pertuzumab, a recombinant anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody, is complementary to trastuzumab's. On 8 June 2012, the Food and Drug Administration approved the combination of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, pertuzumab is the first drug to be approved in the neoadjuvant setting using a pathological complete response as an endpoint. Areas covered: The review provides insights into the main mechanisms of action of pertuzumab. In addition, it gives complete coverage of the landmark clinical and translational trials for this agent. Expert opinion: The new therapeutic algorithm in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced disease and the awaited results of the Aphinity trial are expected to impact the sequence of anti-HER2 treatment. Accordingly, the value of pertuzumab beyond progression needs to be properly studied. Furthermore, to improve the toxicity profile and efficacy of future treatment, new pertuzumab-based regimens are being investigated.