A comparison of the profile-averaged, MH> flux surface model; 2 profile-averaged, low beta model; and a low beta point model. The case considered has RQ-= 8.6 m, B TFC-14 T, Bt * 11*. q(a)-3, and T e-40 keV with no impurities and 100% reflection of the cyclotron radiation. The density and temperature profiles are the saita in the profile-averaged cased 2-4 2-2 Summary of Notation 2-8 2-3 Variation of reactor parameters with the average electron temperature, T e. The case shown has R, * 9.0 m, A = 3.25, B t = 11%, and Bx FC-14 T and In fully catalyzed. The minimum temperature for ignition is 24 keV-, 2-10 2-4 Variation of reactor parameters with the temperature and density profiles. The case shown has RQ = 9 m, A = 3.0, 6 t = 12%, and B T Fc " 14 T 2-11 2-5 Variation of reactor parameters with the cyclotron reflection coefficient. The case shown has R o = 9 m, A = 3.0, Bt = 12%, B TFC-14 T, and T e-30 keV 2-12 2-6 Variation of psrticls and energy confinement times. The case considered has R O »9JB,A*3.0, B t = 12%, B TFC * 14 T » and T e = keV ° 2 " 13 2-7 Performance as a function of reactor type. The basic reactor considered has RQ » 8.6 m, A » 3.25, 8 t = 11%, and Rppg = 14 T. The table is meant to show a comparison of plasmas operated in the various modes only and should not be considered a comparison of viable reactors , «. .. 2-15 2-8 Variation of allowable 3 He recycling. R,,j n is the minimum recycling coefficient; for which ignition occurs. A maximum fraction, f 3-(1-R«i n), of the 3 He diffusion flux incident on the wall can be diverted for other uses.. ,. 2-16 2-9 A sequence of reactor possibilities which have the same total wall loading, P w *• 1.60 M^/n 2 , and the ease ohmic heating field swing, ABOH « 16 T. The plasma beta is assumed to scale as Bt " 0.3S/A. The average temperature is T e • 30 keV. »
