The pharmacodynamic interaction between mizolastine, a new H1 antihistamine, and ethanol was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled study. Eighteen healthy young male volunteers received mizolastine 10 mg, or cetirizine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 1-week wash-out interval. An oral dose of ethanol or ethanol placebo, given 2 h after dosing on days 5 or 7 of each treatment period, was administered to achieve a peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.7 g/l then maintained for 1 h by two further doses of ethanol. Driving ability and psychomotor performance were evaluated using actual and simulated driving tests, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), adaptive tracking and divided attention (DAT) tasks. Ethanol produced a significant decrement in all tasks up to 5.5 h after administration: an increase in steering movements of 4.6, in lateral deviation of 0.45 m, in braking reaction time of 80 ms, in driving test and DAT performance of + 3.2; and a decrease in CFF and in tracking speed of 2.6 m.s-1. Neither mizolastine nor cetirizine significantly impaired driving ability or arousal (CFF) compared with the placebo. However, both drugs significantly impaired DAT performance 6:00 h post-dose (increase of + 2.1 for mizolastine and + 2.4 for cetirizine). The tracking speed was significantly decreased 7:50 h after mizolastine administration (-1.3 m.s-1) and more consistently from 1:30 to 7:50 h after cetirizine administration (-1.4 m.s-1). No significant adverse interaction, i.e. potentiation, occurred between ethanol and either antihistamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Eighteen healthy volunteers received mizolastine 5 mg, 15 mg or 45 mg, terfenadine 60 mg, triprolidine 10 mg or placebo in a 6-way crossover, double blind study. Following each dose, subjects performed a series of tests of cognitive function and psychomotor performance at 1, 3, 5, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. The test battery included critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, tracking, Stroop and Sternberg memory tests and assessment of subjective sedation. Sedative effects and a concomitant reduction in psychomotor and cognitive function were observed following triprolidine, terfenadine and the highest dose of mizolastine, 45 mg, e.g. triprolidine reduced CFF threshold by 1.5 Hz and increased reaction time by 50 ms, impairments comparable to those caused by blood alcohol concentrations of 50 mg%, the legal limit in many countries. Mizolastine 5 mg did not differ significantly from placebo and at 15 mg differed only at one test point at one time. It may be concluded that mizolastine (5 mg and 15 mg) is free from disruptive effects on cognitive function and psychomotor performance, in contrast to terfenadine 60 mg, triprolidine 10 mg and mizolastine 45 mg.

No abstract

Background Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student‐ and trainee‐led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre‐specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. Results A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57–75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1–3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non‐selective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Conclusion NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

after the final dose on day 5. 4 Overall, there were few changes in any of the psychometric tests and although the higher doses of litoxetine improved CFF, these effects were weak in that differences could only be detected when the results were pooled against time. 5 The pharmacokinetic profile of litoxetine was very similar in both the young and middle aged subjects, and there was no difference regarding tolerability. 6 There is little evidence from this study to suggest that litoxetine has any intrinsic sedative activity which is likely to interfere with the performance of activities of everyday life.