Needle biopsy of the breast is widely practised. Image guidance ensures a high degree of accuracy. However, sporadic cases of disease recurrence suggest that in some cases the procedure itself may contribute to this complication. This article reviews evidence relating to needle biopsy of the breast and the potential for tumour cell migration into adjacent tissues following the procedure. A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Results are grouped under three categories: histological evidence of spread, clinical evidence of recurrent disease and the likelihood of seeding dependent upon tumour type. There is histological evidence of seeding of tumour cells from the primary neoplastic site into adjacent breast tissue following biopsy. However, as the interval between biopsy and surgery lengthens then the incidence of seeding declines, which suggests that displaced tumour cells are not viable. Clinical recurrence at the site of a needle biopsy is uncommon and the relationship between biopsy and later recurrence is difficult to confirm. There is some evidence to suggest that cell seeding may be reduced when vacuum biopsy devices are deployed.

In order to determine what influence training would have on their ability to interpret skeletal radiographs from the accident and emergency department, a 6 months training programme was established for three radiographers in various aspects of the radiology of orthopaedics and skeletal trauma. During the study the radiographers reported on radiographs from the accident and emergency department and each month an evaluation of their accuracy was undertaken. The overall radiographer error rate for fracture detection (false positive and false negative) declined during the training period. This was highly significant (p < 0.001). The sensitivity for fracture detection improved from 81.1% at the commencement of the trial to 95.9% at the end. This was also highly significant (p < 0.001). Radiographer specificity for the exclusion of fractures also improved from 94.4% during the first 2 months to 96.6% in the final 2 months, and this was also significant (p < 0.05). The overall error rate of two of the three radiographers improved significantly (p < 0.001) but for one radiographer the improvement did not reach a level of statistical significance. The difference in sensitivity for fracture detection at the commencement of the trial period between radiologist and radiographer was highly significant (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference during the last two months of the trial. The difference in specificity between radiologist and radiographer remained highly significant both at the beginning and the end of the trial (p < 0.001). Experienced radiographers who receive supplementary training in the radiology of skeletal trauma can significantly improve their diagnostic skills and can report such radiographs with a high degree of accuracy. A programme of training and certification of radiographers in fracture reporting could help alleviate the diagnostic radiologists' workload of plain film reporting.

No abstract

No abstract