Context: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is frequently used to stage the axilla preoperatively in patients with primary breast carcinoma. In the light of the ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trials that specified sentinel lymph node biopsy as an inclusion criterion, the role of FNAB in axillary staging is changing. Objective: This article will review the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB in staging of the axilla in patients with primary breast carcinoma. The efficacy of axillary FNAB compared with core-needle biopsy will be evaluated. The evolving approach to staging of the axilla, in the light of ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trials, will be discussed. Data Sources: Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed articles in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and published guidelines including the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer and those from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), Union for International Cancer (UICC), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Conclusions: FNAB of the axilla is almost 100% specific with a sensitivity between 40 and 90%. A positive FNAB reduces the need for a second axillary procedure by up to 20% with reduced morbidity and cost. The recent ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trials have reduced the use of FNAB axilla in American protocols, but it remains the standard of care in Europe.

Background Patients with dementia and delirium are often waiting long times in the emergency department (ED) prior to being transferred to a ward bed during an acute hospital admission. This may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Best practice is for rapid triage to an appropriate bed via a delirium/dementia pathway. Our aim was to document the patient experience time (PET) for older patients with a diagnosis of dementia or delirium in ED in an urban tertiary-referral hospital. Methods Over a two-week period 07/12/20–21/12/20, we identified all patients admitted under a general medical specialty through ED, aged ≥65 years, with a diagnosis of dementia or delirium on the admission sheet. Patients admitted with a stroke or hip fracture were excluded. ED PET was recorded, as well as final ward destination. Results We included 29 patients in the study—median age was 82 years (range 71–92); 19 (66%) were female. Delirium was the presenting complaint in 79.31% (n = 23) of cases. Sixteen (55%) patients presented between 8 am-5 pm. The average time spent from triage to ED doctor review was 1 hour 48 minutes; from ED doctor review to medical referral −1 hour 27 minutes; from medical referral to decision for medical admission—2 hours 28 minutes; from decision for medical admission to ward admission- 5 hours. Overall, the average ED PET for these patients was 10 hours 42 minutes. Five patients (17%) were admitted directly to a Specialist Geriatric Ward (SGW). Twenty patients (69%) did not reach a SGW during the study period. Conclusion Patients with dementia and delirium may spend prolonged periods of time in the ED putting them at risk for multiple complications. We hope that by introduction of a dementia/delirium combined pathway and care bundle that we can reduce PET for these vulnerable patients.

Background Falls are the most common adverse incident of inpatients in Irish hospitals. 6% of inpatient falls cause serious injury. Older inpatients have the highest risk of falling and the highest risk of injury. The post-fall medical review is critical to assess why a patient fell, did the fall cause injury and for the introduction of measures to prevent future falls. We assessed the quality of the post fall reviews in a large hospital. We then introduced a standardised post-fall medical review pro forma and reassessed the quality of the reviews. Methods We reviewed 18 charts of patients that fell in hospital and assessed the documentation of the post fall review in terms of the inclusion of key elements such as patient identifiers, history, examination, injury management and future falls prevention. We then introduced a post-fall standardised pro-forma on five wards in the hospital and following this assessed 19 charts of patients who had fallen looking at the same key elements of the post fall review. We compared the quality of the post-fall review before and after the introduction of the pro forma. Results The post-falls medical review pro forma improved the quality of the post fall medical review. Hip Trauma: 11.1% of doctors asked about hip strike prior to proforma versus 100% who asked with the proforma. Joint examination: 50% assessed this prior to the proforma versus 100% with the pro-forma. Other aspects of the review that improved included head-strike assessment (89% versus 100%), loss of consciousness history (61% versus 95%), medication reviewed (22% versus 68%) and vital signs assessed (67% versus 95%). Conclusion The introduction of a standardised post fall review pro forma improves the quality of this important medical review. It is a useful aid for doctors and provides a framework to follow when reviewing the patient.

Background Falls are the most commonly reported incident in the Health Service Executive (HSE). Inappropriate medications and polypharmacy in the elderly can contribute to increased falls risk. Our aim was to assess whether a medication review was being completed at the time of the post-fall clinician review. Methods We completed a retrospective chart review using an audit tool of consecutive inpatient falls, resulting in serious injury, from March–December 2019. Standards measured against were: HSE Guideline—Service User Falls: A Practical Guide for Review, Medicines and Falls in Hospital: British Society Guidelines, STOPP & START criteria and NICE Guidelines: Falls in Older People 2013. Results We identified 33 charts for review (n = 33)—54.55% (18) female and 45.45% (15) male. Average age was 81 ± 11.2 years. The immediate post-fall review was mainly completed by interns (48.49% (16)) and SHO’s (39.39% (13)). A medication review was carried out 9.09% (3) of the time. A total of n = 28 (84.85%) had poly pharmacy. When analysed for medications known to increase risk of falling, 51.52% (n = 17) were on anti-hypertensives, 45.45% (n = 15) on laxatives, 24.24% (n = 8) on sedative medications, 18.18% (n = 6) on hypnotics/anxiolytics, 15.15% (n = 5) on opioids and 15.15% (n = 5) on diuretics at the time of fall. The majority of these medications (77.42% (n = 24)) were commenced prior to admission. None of these medications were discontinued or the dose changed on review post fall. Conclusion Our audit demonstrates that in a cohort of patients who had an inpatient fall medication discontinuation and dose reductions were not performed. Yet, a high burden of polypharmacy and high-risk falls medication were found. This may result in missing a pertinent opportunity to prevent future falls. We advise a structured medication review is carried out for each patient who suffers an in-patient fall to efficiently modify such an easily identifiable risk factor.

A 69-year-old female was referred to our Emergency Department by her general practitioner (GP) with a 2-day history of slurred speech, word finding difficulties, ataxia, and drowsiness. She had a background history of anxiety and depression, which had deteriorated acutely in the past 5 months following a substantial social stressor in the form * Mensud Hatunic