Genetic allelic heterogeneity is present in Lafora disease associated with mutations in EPM2B. Patients with mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B express similar clinical manifestation, although patients with EPM2B-associated Lafora disease seem to have a slightly milder clinical course. The lack of mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B in two families could be because of the presence of mutations in noncoding, nontested regions or the existence of an additional gene associated with Lafora disease.

Methods: A clinical and molecular study was undertaken in the three affected women. Clinical histories, physical and neurological examinations, brain magnetic resonance imaging studies, and skin biopsies were done. Genetic analysis of the FLNA gene was undertaken by direct sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Results: Mutation analysis of the FLNA gene resulted in the identification of a novel mutation in exon 3 (c.383CRT) segregating with the combination of both syndromes. This mutation results in a substitution of an alanine residue (A128V) in CHD1. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the Ala128Val mutation causes the dual EDS-PNH phenotype. This association constitutes a new variant within the EDS spectrum. This is the first description of a familial EDS-PNH association with a mutation in FLNA.

Background: Lafora disease (LD; progressive myoclonus epilepsy type 2; EPM2) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the EPM2A and EPM2B genes. LD is characterized by the presence of strongly PAS-positive intracellular inclusions (Lafora bodies) in several tissues. Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD-IV; Andersen disease) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by cirrhosis leading to severe liver failure. GSD-IV has been associated with mutations in the glycogen branching enzyme gene (GBE). Histopathologic changes of the liver in both diseases show an identical appearance, although cirrhosis has never been described in patients with LD. We report a LD family in which the proband presented severe liver failure at onset of the disease. Methods: Clinical histories, physical and neurologic examination, laboratory tests, EEGs, MRI of the brain, and liver or axillary skin biopsies were performed in the two affected siblings. The diagnosis was confirmed by molecular genetic analysis of the EPM2A, EPM2B, and GBE genes and loci. Results: During the first decade of life, abnormalities in liver function tests were detected in the two affected siblings. The proband's liver dysfunction was severe enough to require liver transplantation. Subsequently, both sibs developed LD. Mutation analysis of EPM2A revealed a homozygous Arg241stop mutation in both patients. Conclusions: This is the first description of severe hepatic dysfunction as the initial clinical manifestation of LD. The phenotypic differences between the two affected siblings suggest that modifier genes must condition clinical expression of the disease outside the CNS.

Summary: Purpose:We observed three apparently unrelated and geographically separate Arab families with Lafora disease in Israel and the Palestinian territories.Methods: We clinically evaluated the families and analyzed their DNA for EPM2A mutations.Results: Of seven individuals with Lafora disease, the clinical onset varied from 13 to 20 years. All three families shared the same novel homozygous deletion in EPM2A. Haplotype analysis around the deletion showed that the families shared a common homozygous haplotype. The boundaries of this haplotype varied between families and even within one family.Conclusions: We conclude that considerable variability in the age at onset of Lafora disease can occur within families. Identical mutations can be associated with the classic adolescent presentation, as well as late-onset cases. Haplotype analysis suggests that this EPM2A mutation arose many generations previously, so it may be of importance for cases distributed more widely in the Middle East.