No abstract

Soil ingestion can be a major exposure route for humans to many immobile soil contaminants. Exposure to soil contaminants can be overestimated if oral bioavailability is not taken into account. Several in vitro digestion models simulating the human gastrointestinal tract have been developed to assess mobilization of contaminants from soil during digestion, i.e., bioaccessibility. Bioaccessibility is a crucial step in controlling the oral bioavailability for soil contaminants. To what extent in vitro determination of bioaccessibility is method dependent has, until now, not been studied. This paper describes a multi-laboratory comparison and evaluation of five in vitro digestion models. Their experimental design and the results of a round robin evaluation of three soils, each contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, and lead, are presented and discussed. A wide range of bioaccessibility values were found for the three soils: for As 6-95%, 1-19%, and 10-59%; for Cd 7-92%, 5-92%, and 6-99%; and for Pb 4-91%, 1-56%, and 3-90%. Bioaccessibility in many cases is less than 50%, indicating that a reduction of bioavailability can have implications for health risk assessment. Although the experimental designs of the different digestion systems are distinct, the main differences in test results of bioaccessibility can be explained on the basis of the applied gastric pH. High values are typically observed for a simple gastric method, which measures bioaccessibility in the gastric compartment at low pHs of 1.5. Other methods that also apply a low gastric pH, and include intestinal conditions, produce lower bioaccessibility values. The lowest bioaccessibility values are observed for a gastrointestinal method which employs a high gastric pH of 4.0.

Soil ingestion can be a major route of human exposure to many immobile soil contaminants. The present risk assessment is based on toxicity studies in which contaminants are typically ingested in liquid or food matrices. The difference in bioavailability of contaminants ingested in a soil matrix is not taken into account. To become bioavailable, contaminants first need to become bioaccessible, i.e., they must be mobilized from the soil during digestion. Soil contaminants may be less bioaccessible than contaminants from liquid or food, so that the risks can be overestimated. This article describes the development of an in vitro human digestion model that is physiologically based. It can be used as a tool to assess bioaccessibility. We explain the rationale behind the experimental design of the model. We address the aspects of the simulated compartments of the gastrointestinal tract, temperature, soil-to-fluid ratio, ratio of digestive juices, transit times, centrifugation, pH values, mixing, constituents and their concentrations, and bile. The optimized in vitro digestion model was applied in a case study. The bioaccessibility of lead in pottery flakes with glazing was determined and compared to the bioaccessibility of lead in the soil from which the pottery flakes were removed. The data indicate that pottery flake lead is considerably less bioaccessible (0.3 +/- 0.2%) than lead in soil without pottery flakes (42-66% at the same site, and 28-73% at other sites in the same town). Furthermore, bioaccessibility values of lead in soil appear to be less than calculated bioaccessibility values for dietary lead (which are based on the criterion used by the Dutch risk assessment and on literature absorption data). This indicates that accounting for the matrix of ingestion can affect the exposure assessment for lead. The in vitro digestion model is a promising tool for studying the effect of the ingestion matrix on bioaccessibility.