Young children with atopic asthma had a significantly greater AMP responsiveness than those with non-atopic asthma, whereas methacholine responsiveness was not significantly different between the two groups. The degree of atopy appeared to be an important factor in AMP responsiveness, but not in methacholine responsiveness, and thus might be a marker of airway inflammation in asthma.
Bronchodilator response (BDR) is assessed to estimate the reversibility of airflow obstruction. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma and is usually measured by means of bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli. The aim of the present study was to compare BHR to methacholine (direct) and that to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) (indirect) with regard to their relationships to BDR in asthmatic children.Methacholine and AMP challenge tests were performed on 138 children with mild-to-moderate asthma, and the provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (PC20) was determined for each challenge. BDR was calculated as the change in FEV1, expressed as a percentage of the initial value, after inhalation of 400 mg salbutamol.Methacholine PC20 correlated significantly but weakly with BDR (r5 -0.254; p50.003). However, there was a significant and strong correlation between AMP PC20 and BDR (r5 -0.489; p50.000). For AMP PC20, the relationship was closer than for methacholine PC20 (p50.024 for comparison between correlation coefficients). The same figures were observed when BDR was expressed as a percentage of the predicted value.A stronger correlation of BDR with AMP PC20 than with methacholine PC20 suggests that BDR may be better reflected by BHR as assessed by AMP challenge than by methacholine challenge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.