Serial computed tomographic (CT) scans of 200 patients with malignant testicular teratomas were reviewed. Of the 200 patients, 120 were treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 80 patients with no evidence of metastases (stage I disease) received no treatment and served as a control group. CT was performed at regular intervals for ongoing follow-up in both groups. Thymic enlargement occurred 3-14 months after initiation of treatment in 14 of the 120 patients (11.6%) who received chemotherapy but in only one patient in the control group. Histologic examination in one patient who received chemotherapy revealed that the thymic enlargement represented true hyperplasia. Thirteen of the 14 patients (93%) with thymic enlargement after chemotherapy were well and disease free on mean follow-up of 45 months, compared with 78% of the group that did not show thymic enlargement after chemotherapy (P less than .02). Rebound thymic hyperplasia in adults after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular teratoma may be a good prognostic feature and should be considered when an anterior mediastinal mass develops after chemotherapy for metastatic malignancy.
Four cases of focal sparing in otherwise diffuse fatty infiltration of the liver are reported. The characteristic features are described as shown at sonography, computed tomography (CT) and scintigraphy. It is emphasised that, with ultrasound, if the increased echogenicity of the majority of the liver is not appreciated, then the area of normal hepatic parenchyma may be misinterpreted as a pathological hypoechoic lesion.
Purpose To assess whether individual reader performance with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and two-dimensional (2D) mammography varies with number of years of experience or volume of 2D mammograms read. Materials and Methods After written informed consent was obtained, 8869 women (age range, 29-85 years; mean age, 56 years) were recruited into the TOMMY trial (A Comparison of Tomosynthesis with Digital Mammography in the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program), an ethically approved, multicenter, multireader, retrospective reading study, between July 2011 and March 2013. Each case was read prospectively for clinical assessment and to establish ground truth. A retrospective reading data set of 7060 cases was created and randomly allocated for independent blinded review of (a) 2D mammograms, (b) DBT images and 2D mammograms, and (c) synthetic 2D mammograms and DBT images, without access to previous examinations. Readers (19 radiologists, three advanced practitioner radiographers, and two breast clinicians) who had 3-25 (median, 10) years of experience in the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program and read 5000-13 000 (median, 8000) cases per annum were included in this study. Specificity was analyzed according to reader type and years and volume of experience, and then both specificity and sensitivity were analyzed by matched inference. The median duration of experience (10 years) was used as the cutoff point for comparison of reader performance. Results Specificity improved with the addition of DBT for all readers. This was significant for all staff groups (56% vs 68% and 49% vs 67% [P < .0001] for radiologists and advanced practitioner radiographers, respectively; 46% vs 55% [P = .02] for breast clinicians). Sensitivity was improved for 19 of 24 (79%) readers and was significantly higher for those with less than 10 years of experience (91% vs 86%; P = .03) and those with total mammographic experience of fewer than 80 000 cases (88% vs 86%; P = .03). Conclusion The addition of DBT to conventional 2D screening mammography improved specificity for all readers, but the gain in sensitivity was greater for readers with less than 10 years of experience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.