IntroductionOptimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains challenging. Flash glucose monitoring with FreeStyle Libre 2 (FSL2) is a novel alternative to the current standard of care self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). No randomised controlled trials to date have explored the potential benefits of FSL2 in T1D. We aim to assess the impact of FSL2 in people with suboptimal glycaemic control T1D in comparison with SMBG.MethodsThis open-label, multicentre, randomised (via stochastic minimisation), parallel design study conducted at eight UK secondary and primary care centres will aim to recruit 180 people age ≥16 years with T1D for >1 year and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.5%–11%. Eligible participants will be randomised to 24 weeks of FSL2 (intervention) or SMBG (control) periods, after 2-week of blinded sensor wear. Participants will be assessed virtually or in-person owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. HbA1c will be measured at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks (primary outcome). Participants will be contacted at 4 and 12 weeks for glucose optimisation. Control participants will wear a blinded sensor during the last 2 weeks. Psychosocial outcomes will be measured at baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include sensor-based metrics, insulin doses, adverse events and self-report psychosocial measures. Utility, acceptability, expectations and experience of using FSL2 will be explored. Data on health service resource utilisation will be collected.AnalysisEfficacy analyses will follow intention-to-treat principle. Outcomes will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusted for the baseline value of the corresponding outcome, minimisation factors and other known prognostic factors. Both within-trial and life-time economic evaluations, informed by modelling from the perspective of the National Health Service setting, will be performed.EthicsThe study was approved by Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (reference 19/NW/0081). Informed consent will be sought from all participants.Trial registration numberNCT03815006.Protocol version4.0 dated 29 June 2020.
Thiazolidinediones cause sodium retention and edema by a direct effect on the kidneys. The aim of this study was to use the technique of head-out water immersion to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone on sodium and volume homeostasis in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The volume expansion response to water immersion was compared with the response on a non-immersion control day in 12 nondiabetic male subjects and 8 diet-controlled male type 2 diabetic subjects with hourly blood and urine sampling over a 4-h period. This was repeated after both groups had taken 4 mg of rosiglitazone daily for 7 days. Immersion produced a natriuresis in both groups (P < 0.001). An impairment of this natriuresis was seen in the diabetic subjects (P = 0.006). However, when rosiglitazone was taken, there was no significant difference in immersion-induced natriuresis compared with nondiabetic controls (P = 0.2). There was an immersion-induced rise in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), in the healthy subjects (ANP P = 0.001, cGMP P = 0.043), which was not seen in the diabetic subjects (ANP P = 0.51, cGMP P = 0.74). Rosiglitazone restored the immersion-induced increase in cGMP excretion and rise of ANP in the diabetic group (ANP P = 0.048, cGMP P = 0.009). This study confirms that type 2 diabetic subjects have an impaired natriuretic response to acute volume expansion, which appears to be enhanced rather than diminished by rosiglitazone. This may be related to its effects in increasing natriuretic peptides and restoring the impaired cGMP excretion to volume expansion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.