An observational study was conducted to compare various outcomes before and after the introduction of outpatient preoperative evaluation (OPE). Although smaller than anticipated, OPE for potential inpatients leads to a significant reduction of canceled cases and of length of admission.

In many patients, a 'type and screen' procedure is routinely performed before surgery. However, most patients are not transfused after all. Can we predict, which surgical patients will and will not be transfused, to reduce the number of these investigations? We studied 1482 consecutive surgical patients with intermediate risk for transfusion. Multivariate logistic regression modelling and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC area) were used to quantify how well age, gender, surgical procedure, emergency or elective surgery and anaesthetic technique predicted transfusion, and whether the preoperative haemoglobin concentration had added predictive value. Gender, age > or =70 yr, and type of surgery were independent predictors of transfusion, with a ROC area of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79). Validating this model with an easily used prediction rule in a second patient population yielded a ROC area of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77). With this rule type and screen could correctly be withheld in 35% of these patients. In the remaining 65% of the patients, a further reduction in type and screen investigations of 15% could be achieved using the preoperative haemoglobin concentration. Using a simple prediction rule, preoperative type and screen investigations in patients who have to undergo surgery procedures with intermediate transfusion risk can be avoided in about 50%. This may reduce patient burden and hospital costs (on average: 3 million US$ per 100 000 procedures).

The propofol requirements for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were compared in groups of younger and older patients. Side effects, influence on the cardiovascular system and recovery times were compared between 20 unpremedicated ASA I-III, 25-40-yr-old patients and 20 65-80-yr-old patients all scheduled to undergo elective surgery. After induction with propofol, anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of the drug. Vecuronium and fentanyl were administered as required. In the young group propofol 2.2 mg kg-1 and in the elderly 1.7 mg kg-1 were needed for induction (P less than 0.05). The maintenance doses were 10.0 mg kg-1 h-1 and 8.6 mg kg-1 h-1, respectively (P less than 0.01). Side effects were more pronounced in the younger patients. Influences on the cardiovascular system were definite, but mild. The younger patients awoke sooner: 7.8 v. 14.3 min (P less than 0.01) after the discontinuation of the infusion of propofol.

SummaryWe prospectively estimated the prevalence of heart murmurs in 2522 consecutive adult noncardiac surgery patients during pre-operative evaluation. Factors that contribute to the detection of a heart murmur were identified, and echocardiography was used to evaluate to what extent a murmur reflected presence of valvular heart disease. A cardiac murmur was detected in 106 patients (prevalence 4.2%, 95% CI: 3.5-5.1%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that age and general physical impression were independently associated with detecting a murmur (p-values < 0.01). In 83 (79%) of the patients with a murmur, an echocardiographic diagnosis was available: 39% had aortic valve abnormalities, 24% had mitral valve regurgitation, 7% had other valvular heart disease and 30% did not have any abnormality. Thus, 58 of the 83 patients had valvular heart disease (positive predictive value using routine cardiac auscultation for diagnosing VHD: 70%, 95% CI: 59-79%). Murmurs in patients younger than 40 years never reflected valvular heart disease. Pre-operative cardiac auscultation seems only reasonable in patients aged 40 years or older. Subsequent echocardiography in these selected patients is necessary.