Targeted mutagenesis in mice, a powerful tool for the analysis of gene function and human disease, makes extensive use of 129 mouse substrains. Although all are named 129, we document that outcrossing of these substrains, both deliberate and accidental, has lead to extensive genetic variability among substrains and embryonic stem cells derived from them. This clearer understanding of 129 substrain variability allows consideration of its negative impact on targeting technology, including: homologous recombination frequencies, preparation of inbred animals, and availability of appropriate controls. Based on these considerations we suggest a number of recommendations for future experimental design.

No abstract

No abstract

Severely reduced fertility is a common finding in cystic fibrosis (CF). We used in situ hybridization to examine the cell-specific expression of CFTR in the reproductive organs of rodents. In males CFTR mRNA is found in the round spermatids (spermatogenic stages V-X) and in the principal cells that line the initial segment of the epididymis. In both the testis and the epididymis, CFTR expression is developmentally regulated suggesting that the defect in the genital tract of male CF patients is of developmental origin. CFTR expression in the luminal and glandular epithelium of the uterus is regulated during the oestrous cycle and is maximal at pro-oestrus. Our results provide a biological rationale for the reduced fertility of CF patients, and suggest a possible cause for the comparatively poorer prognosis for women with CF.

Characterization of genetically engineered mice requires consideration of the gene of interest and the genetic background on which the mutation is maintained. A fundamental prerequisite to deciphering the genetic factors that influence the phenotype of a mutant mouse is an understanding of genetic nomenclature. Mutations and transgenes are often maintained on segregating or mixed backgrounds of often-unspecified origin. Minimizing the importance of strain and substrain differences, especially among 129 strains, can lead to poor experimental design or faulty interpretations of data. Genetic factors that influence phenotype can be categorized as traits that are unique to the background strain, unique to the gene of interest, or an interaction of both the background strain and the gene of interest. The commonly used inbred strains are generally well characterized and understood; however, specific genetic alterations combined with genes unique to the background inbred strain may lead to unexpected results. Genetic background effects can be analyzed and controlled for by using specific targeting and breeding strategies. Selection of appropriate experimental controls is critical. Ideally, mutations or transgenes should be characterized on more than one genetic background and in hybrids of the two progenitor strains. This approach may lead to the identification of novel genetic modifiers of the "gene of interest." Conditional mutagenesis technologies increase the options for controlling genetic background effects in addition to permitting the study of developmental and temporal changes in gene and protein expression and thus phenotype.