The concept of p-space is quite recent. It was introduced by Arhangel'skii [2]. The definition of p-space given in [2] involves compactification of the space. In view of the interesting properties of p-spaces obtained in [2], Alexadroff [1] suggested a problem of finding a direct intrinsic definition (without appeal to compactification). The main aim of this note is to answer the above problem.I am grateful to Dr. S. K. Kaul for his comments.
This note is closely related, as far as methods are concerned, to [3]. In [3] Ponomarev established “In order for a regular space X to be Lindelöf, it is necessary and sufficient that for each open covering ω of the space X there exists an ω-mapping ƒ:X → Y onto some separable metric space Y.” It is the purpose of this note to show that if the word “countable (or finite)” is inserted in the proper place we can obtain an analogous characterization for normal countably paracompact (or normal) spaces.
In [1] Arhangel'skiĭ announced that any σ-paracompact p-space could be mapped onto a Moore space by a perfect map. However Burke [3] recently showed that this is not true in general and he gave an example of a T2, locally compact, σ-paracompact space which cannot be mapped onto a Moore space by a perfect map.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.