Many studies have detected in the brain of schizophrenic patients various morphological and structural abnormalities in various regions and in particular in the cortical and limbic areas. These abnormalities might in part result from neurodevelopmental disturbances suggesting that schizophrenia might have organic causes. These abnormalities may be the primary event in schizophrenia and be responsible for altered dopaminergic, but not only dopaminergic, neurotransmission in these regions. If schizophrenia is in some way strictly related to brain morphological abnormalities it becomes hard to believe that a curative treatment will ever be possible. Considering this scenario, treatment of schizophrenia will be restricted to symptomatic and preventive therapy and therefore, more effective and better tolerated antipsychotics are necessary. The widely used classical antipsychotic drugs present some disadvantages. They do not improve all symptoms of schizophrenia, are not effective in all patients, produce a number of unpleasant and serious, and partly irreversible, motor side effects. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine constitutes a major advance in particular for patients not responding to conventional neuroleptics. To explain the unique therapeutic effect of clozapine many hypothesis have been proposed. Most of the explanations given so far assume that the D2 blockade is the basis for the antipsychotic activity of clozapine and that the difference in respect to other antipsychotics is due to the contribution of other receptor interactions. Considering the dopaminergic receptor, in particular the recently discovered D4 receptor subtype, it has been observed that even if several classical neuroleptics exhibit high affinity to the D4 receptor, clozapine is more selective for this subtype compared to D2 receptors. Moreover clozapine, differently from all other conventional neuroleptics, is a mixed but weak D1/D2 antagonist. This observation has prompted speculation that the synergism between D1 and D2 receptors might allow antipsychotic effects to be achieved below the threshold for unwanted motor side effects. Probably the D1 antagonistic activity exerted by clozapine at low doses enhances preferentially the extracellular concentration of dopamine in specific areas of the brain, such as the prefrontal cortex, where a dopaminergic hypoactivity has been suggested to be in part responsible for negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The clozapine enhancement of dopaminergic activity in this brain area might explain its efficacy against schizophrenia negative symptoms. However, it cannot be excluded that the affinities displayed by clozapine for other nondopaminergic receptors also contribute to its unique therapeutic profile. The various hypotheses mentioned in this review need to be further validated or disproved. The only way to do that is developing new drugs where the postulated mechanistic profile is specifically realized and to clinically test these compounds.
The neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) appears to be involved in the control of gonadotropin secretion. These studies were conducted 1) to evaluate the effect of GABAergic drugs on in vitro LHRH secretion and 2) to characterize the role of different types of GABA receptors (the GABA-A and GABA-B subtypes) in these actions. Arcuate nuclei-median eminence fragments were incubated in vitro, and the release of LHRH, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), arginine vasopressin, and oxytocin was measured by RIA. Both GABA and muscimol at different concentrations induced an increase in LHRH release, but did not affect the release of arginine vasopressin and oxytocin. This stimulatory effect was blocked by the specific GABA antagonist bicuculline, suggesting the involvement of GABA-A type receptors. Muscimol-stimulated LHRH release was not affected by the presence of phentolamine, suggesting that the stimulatory effect of GABA-A receptors on LHRH release is not mediated by interactions with the noradrenergic system. PGE2 has been shown to be a potent secretagogue of LHRH from the median eminence in vitro, and in this model the stimulatory effect of PGE2 was enhanced by muscimol. Baclofen, a specific GABA-B type receptor agonist, had no effect on basal LHRH release, but completely suppressed naloxone-stimulated LHRH and PGE2 secretion. The inhibitory effect of baclofen was blocked by the presence of 5-aminovalerate, a drug that has been shown to block the inhibitory effect of baclofen on NE release from noradrenergic terminals. This suggests the possibility that GABA-B receptors interacting with noradrenergic terminals may be responsible for the inhibitory effect of baclofen on naloxone stimulation. This study uncovered both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of GABA on LHRH release after activation of GABA-A or GABA-B receptors, respectively. Further, the data show possible relationships among the GABAergic, endogenous opiate peptide, and noradrenergic systems in the control of LHRH release from the hypothalamus.
gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) activities were measured in the ovary and the Fallopian tube of rats and compared with brain values. GABA levels in the Fallopian tube were about twice as high as in the brain, while in the ovary they represented only about 5% of the amino acid content of the CNS. In vitro decarboxylation of glutamate, measured via CO2 formation, occurred both in the Fallopian tube and in the ovary. These two organs contained, respectively, 10% and 1% of brain GAD activity. However, the actual formation of GABA from glutamate in a high-speed supernatant was detectable only in the Fallopian tube, where it represented about 5% of brain GAD activity. In contrast with the enzyme present in ovary, liver, anterior pituitary, and kidney, that in the Fallopian tube was quantitatively precipitated by a specific antiserum directed against rat neuronal GAD. Moreover, subcutaneous transplantation resulted in a quantitative decrease of both GABA levels and GAD activity in the Fallopian tube while no change occurred in the ovary, and vagus nerve section induced a 50% decrease of GAD activity in the Fallopian tube, although GABA levels were not significantly altered. The findings suggest an extrinsic GABAergic innervation in the rat Fallopian tube but not in the ovary.
Recent evidence suggests that the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays an important role in the control of gonadotropin secretion. The present study was conducted to identify the effect and site of action of different GABAergic drugs on LH secretion in vivo and to characterize the precise roles of different GABA receptors in these actions. Three different GABAergic drugs were used: muscimol and baclofen, which act at the level of the GABA A- and GABA B-receptors, respectively, and aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA), which increases the GABA content in the brain. The effects of these drugs were investigated in situations of enhanced LH secretion due to administration of naloxone or LHRH. In an initial experiment, adult male rats were treated ip with AOAA, followed by naloxone. AOAA treatment decreased basal LH levels and prevented naloxone-stimulated LH release. PRL levels were decreased by either AOAA or naloxone; however, the combination of these two drugs did not induce an additional or synergistic effect on the decreased PRL levels. In subsequent experiments, freely moving rats bearing Silastic cannulae in the right jugular vein received AOAA, muscimol, or baclofen a few minutes before either naloxone or LHRH administration. Baclofen and AOAA completely suppressed the naloxone-stimulated LH increase. Muscimol did not prevent the effect of naloxone. None of the three GABAergic drugs affected LH release in rats receiving LHRH. The results of these in vivo experiments suggest that the GABAergic system exerts primarily an inhibitory effect on gonadotropin secretion which is mediated at a central level, since pituitary responsiveness to LHRH is not affected by GABAergic drug treatment. GABA B-receptors are responsible for the inhibitory action of GABA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.