Novel methodologies for detection of chromosomal abnormalities have been made available in the recent years but their clinical utility in prenatal settings is still unknown. We have conducted a comparative study of currently available methodologies for detection of chromosomal abnormalities after invasive prenatal sampling. A multicentric collection of a 1-year series of fetal samples with indication for prenatal invasive sampling was simultaneously evaluated using three screening methodologies: (1) karyotype and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), (2) two panels of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and (3) chromosomal microarray-based analysis (CMA) with a targeted BAC microarray. A total of 900 pregnant women provided informed consent to participate (94% acceptance rate). Technical performance was excellent for karyotype, QF-PCR, and CMA (~1% failure rate), but relatively poor for MLPA (10% failure). Mean turn-around time (TAT) was 7 days for CMA or MLPA, 25 for karyotype, and two for QF-PCR, with similar combined costs for the different approaches. A total of 57 clinically significant chromosomal aberrations were found (6.3%), with CMA yielding the highest detection rate (32% above other methods). The identification of variants of uncertain clinical significance by CMA (17, 1.9%) tripled that of karyotype and MLPA, but most alterations could be classified as likely benign after proving they all were inherited. High acceptability, significantly higher detection rate and lower TAT, could justify the higher cost of CMA and favor targeted CMA as the best method for detection of chromosomal abnormalities in at-risk pregnancies after invasive prenatal sampling.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-011-1095-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
We present three patients with variegated aneuploidy and premature centromere division (PCD), a rare chromosomal abnormality in humans. Comparison of these three and eight other patients with variegated aneuploidy related to PCD demonstrates a phenotype comprising most frequently microcephaly, CNS anomalies (with cerebellar affection and migration defects), mental retardation, pre-and postnatal growth retardation, flat and broad nasal bridge, apparently low-set ears, eye and skin abnormalities, and ambiguous genitalia in male patients. The occurrence of Wilms tumor in three patients, rhabdomyosarcoma in two others and acute leukemia in a fifth characterizes this condition as a chromosome or genome instability disorder with a high risk of malignancy. FISH studies in uncultured blood and buccal smear cells demonstrate that the random aneuploidies are not limited to cultured cells, but also occur in vivo.
This report describes the fourth case of heritable 18p monosomy, which was ascertained by prenatal diagnosis. Cytogenetic analysis of amniotic fluid cells by G-banding showed an apparently distal 18p chromosome deletion and a derivative X chromosome resulting from a translocation between the X and Y chromosomes. Analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the parents by G-banding revealed the same chromosome 18 deletion in the mother, who did not have the X/Y translocation. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies confirmed the loss of chromosome region 18p11.3-pter previously detected, and eliminated the presence of unbalanced reorganizations of other chromosome regions. No subtle translocation was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies using whole chromosome specific painting probes. This is a new report of a heritable 18p monosomy. Although in our case the mother had several minor congenital malformations, the loss of 18p11.3 band was not associated with any obvious phenotypic alteration in the fetus.
Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies by QF-PCR is a sensitive, efficient, and reliable assay. When applied in multiple pregnancies, it has the added value of allowing the assessment of zygosity in all cases, independently of chorionicity and fetal sex.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.