Background: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials. Objective:We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort.Methods: Patients were included between March 2017 and April 2018. Efficacy outcomes were collected both at baseline and three months (M3), when available, including SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) and EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) scores. Adverse events (AE) were recorded at the follow-up. Results:We included 241 patients. The median follow-up time was 3.8±3.7 months. SCORAD75 and EASI75 were achieved in 27/163 (16.6%) and 40/82 (48.8%) patients, respectively. The median SCORAD and EASI at M3 were significantly lower compared with baseline (25±21 vs 56±27.4, p<10 -9 and 4.1±6.8 vs 17.9±15.4, p<10 -9 , respectively).Conjunctivitis was reported in 84/241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion of eosinophilia (>500/mm 3 ) during follow-up (57%) was higher than at baseline (33.7%) (n=172, p<10 -6 ).Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases, 27 of which were due to an AE. Limitations:No control group, missing data. Conclusion:This real-life study demonstrated results similar to clinical trials, with regard to dupilumab effectiveness, but revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.

Objective. Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (HUV) is an uncommon vasculitis of unknown etiology that is rarely described in the literature. We undertook this study to analyze the clinical spectrum and the therapeutic management of patients with HUV.Methods. We conducted a French nationwide retrospective study that included 57 patients with chronic urticaria, histologic leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and hypocomplementemia. We assessed clinical and laboratory data and evaluated the patients' cutaneous and immunologic responses to therapy. We evaluated

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have been suspected to induce bullous pemphigoid (BP). The objective of this study was to compare the observed frequency of gliptin intake in a large sample of 1,787 BP patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 in France, with the expected frequency after indirect age standardization on 225,412 individuals extracted from the database of the National Healthcare Insurance Agency. The secondary objective was to assess the clinical characteristics and the course of gliptin-associated BP, depending on whether gliptin was continued or stopped. The observed frequencies of intake of the whole gliptin class and that of vildagliptin in the BP population were higher than those in the general population after age standardization (whole gliptin class: 6.0%; 95% confidence interval ¼ 4.9e7.1% vs. 3.6%, observed-to-expected drug intake ratio ¼ 1.7; 95% confidence interval ¼ 1.4e2.0; P < 0.0001; vildagliptin ¼ 3.3%; 95% confidence interval ¼ 2.5e4.1% vs. 0.7%, ratio ¼ 4.4; 95% confidence interval ¼ 3.5e5.7; P < 0.0001). The association of any gliptinþmetformin was also higher than in the general population, ratio ¼ 1.8 (95% confidence interval ¼ 1.3e2.4; P < 0.0001). Gliptin-associated BP had no specific clinical characteristics. Gliptin was stopped in 48 (45.3%) cases. Median duration to achieve disease control, rate, and delay of relapse were not different whether gliptin was stopped or continued. This study strongly supports the association between gliptin intake, particularly vildagliptin, and the onset of BP.

The Raf kinases play an important and specific role in the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) cascade. Beside its role in the control of proliferation and differentiation, the ERK cascade has also been implicated in neuron-specific functions. In order to gain clues on the function of Raf kinases in the adult central nervous system (CNS), we performed a comparative analysis of the distribution and subcellular localization of the different Raf kinases in rat brain with antibodies specific for the different Raf kinases. We show that B-Raf and Raf-1 proteins are present in most brain areas, whereas A-Raf is not detected. Interestingly, the two Raf proteins have an approximately similar pattern of distribution with a rostro-caudal decreasing gradient of expression. These two kinases are colocalized in neurons but they are differentially located in subcellular compartments. Raf-1 is localized mainly in the cytosolic fraction around the nucleus, whereas B-Raf is widely distributed in the cell bodies and in the neuritic processes. In addition, we demonstrated that numerous B-Raf isoforms are present in the brain. These isoforms have a differential pattern of distribution, some of them being ubiquitously expressed whereas others are localized to specific brain areas. These isoforms also have a clear differential subcellular localization, specially in Triton-insoluble fractions, but also in synaptosomal, membrane and cytosolic compartments. Altogether these results suggest that each Raf protein could have a distinct signalling regulatory function in the brain with regard to its subcellular localization.

Many patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid had heterogeneous clinical presentation and a more severe prognosis than previously suspected.