The purpose of this study was to determine the normal variations of cochlear nerve canal dimensions, which is useful information to have when assessing congenital malformations, i.e. during the preoperative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates. The length and diameter of the cochlear nerve canal were measured in 117 casts from randomly selected temporal bone specimens obtained from the Uppsala Temporal Bone Laboratory. In 16 of the casts the dimensions were correlated with those obtained from CT scans of the same temporal bone. Measurements were also made from CT examinations of the temporal bone of 50 patients referred for evaluation of cholesteatoma or chronic otitis media. The mean length and diameter in the axiopetrosal plane measured in casts were 1.17 and 2.58 mm, respectively. The mean diameter in the axial plane was 2.59 mm. The mean length and diameter determined from CT scans of the specimens were 1.19 and 1.98 mm, respectively. The mean length and diameter determined from CT examinations of patients were 1.08 and 1.91 mm, respectively. In conclusion, the cochlear nerve canal is short, with a circular cross-section. If the diameter of the canal is < 1.4 mm then the possibility of cochlear nerve abnormality should be considered; if it is > 3.0 mm then other anomalies may coexist.

A thorough knowledge of the normal range of variation of anatomy and topography of the cochlea is necessary for optimal reproduction of this structure and correct interpretation of the radiographs. Radiographic identification of incomplete cochlear coils is essential in the diagnosis of congenital malformations such as Modini's deformity. Furthermore, a diagnosis of otosclerosis/otospongiosis has to be based on recognition of changes in the otic capsule. The size and shape of the human cochlea and the normal ranges of variation of its dimensions were evaluated in 95 plastic casts, prepared from temporal bone specimens. The normal range of variation is fairly small, and is not age-dependent. Obvious digression from this range, associated with pertinent clinical symptoms, indicates an abnormality.

Comparing the rate of missed cases from different studies may be misleading unless the same review method is used. No difference in detection rate could be shown whether the radiologist reviewed images from his/her own screening unit or not. Most of our interval cancers were not regarded as missed cases by either of the two methods.

In a series of six cochlear-implant candidates, including three small children, labyrinthine ossification in various stages of development was observed at CT. In four of the candidates the ossifying process was more advanced in the semicircular canals than in the cochleae, and in two equally distributed. The ossifying process developed during a period of 4-5 months in two of the children. Asymmetry of its extension was found in four patients. The causative organisms were Hemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The radiologic assessment of cochlear-implant candidates should include the semicircular canals where the ossification may start, and herald the development of cochlear ossification.