The clinical significance of pre-transplant donorspecific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month posttransplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSAnegative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring posttransplant.

. This assay will no longer be manufactured after December 31, 2009; the only commercially available FDA-licensed assay will be the Abbott PRISM HTLV-I/II assay which poses many challenges to OPO use for organ donor screening. As a result, screening donors for HTLV-1/2 in a timely manner pretransplant after December 31, 2009 will be challenging. The true incidence of HTLV-1 in United States (U.S.) organ donors is not well described but appears to be low (∼0.03-0.5%). HTLV-1 is associated with malignancy and neurological disease; HTLV-2 has not been convincingly associated with disease in humans. Donors that are HTLV-1/2 seropositive are infrequently used despite most results being either false positive or resulting from HTLV-2 infection. There is urgent need to encourage the development of assays, instruments and platforms optimized for organ donors that can be used to screen for transmissible disease in donors; these must have appropriate sensitivity and specificity to identify all infections while minimizing organ loss through false positive testing.

The ability to efficiently and accurately diagnose the cause(s) of platelet (PLT) refractoriness is paramount in providing effective PLT products for transfusion. Recent advances in methods for detecting and identifying alloantibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and human PLT antigens, combined with accurate molecular techniques for HLA typing, have provided a framework for the development of clinical algorithms to support such patients. Alloantibodies may be detected and/or identified by several methods, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and microbead-based assays using Luminex or flow cytometry. The primary difference in these assays is the sensitivity of detection and the range of antibody specificities that may be reliably identified. Direct PLT cross-matching to identify compatible PLTs can be accomplished by several methods, including solid-phase red cell adherence, modified antigen capture ELISA, and flow cytometry. A survey of blood centers and laboratories providing transfusion support has identified the heterogeneity of testing options available, areas of concern and need for improvement, and common obstacles in providing appropriate and timely support to immune-refractory PLT patients. Depending on the testing methods and the pool of HLA-typed PLT donors available, there are numerous options for developing suitable algorithms to provide effective support to immune-refractory PLT patients.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of pancreas transplantation. We describe a 54-year-old male with type 1 diabetes who received a zero-antigen mismatched pancreas-after-kidney transplant from a pancreas donor who was homozygous at the HLA-B, -Cw, -DR, and -DQ alleles. Starting on postoperative day (POD) #22, the patient developed persistent fevers. Workup was notable only for low-grade cytomegalovirus viremia, which was treated. The fevers eventually disappeared. On POD #106, the patient was noted to have a diffuse erythematous rash. A skin biopsy was consistent with GVHD. Short tandem repeat DNA analysis of both peripheral blood lymphocytes and skin demonstrated mixed chimerism, confirming the diagnosis of GHVD. Soon after diagnosis, the patient developed pancytopenia and fevers and died of multiorgan failure on POD #145. Transplant clinicians should consider GVHD as a possible, although admittedly rare, cause of fevers of unknown origin in recipients of pancreas transplants.

Flow PRA and SAB are now routinely performed to identify HLA antibodies in the recipient sera. The presence of DSA is considered a risk factor for graft failure. However, this risk is not clearly defined. We reviewed all the pediatric recipients of living donor kidney transplants since Flow PRA and Flow SAB became routinely done at our institution. All children had negative CDC and Flow XMs. Comparison of clinical outcome was done between those with and without pretransplant DSA. Six children had positive DSA by Flow SAB. They received thymoglobulin, steroids, tacrolimus, and MMF. Five had anti-HLA class I antibodies and one anti-HLA class II. Only one child had an AR. Graft survival: 100% at last visit with GFR >70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). A control group without DSA was used for comparison (n = 44). They received our standard protocol: basiliximab, tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids. AR rate was 9%. Both groups had similar follow-up time, and patient and graft survival rates. In our small series, we saw excellent outcome despite the presence of DSA pretransplant. No unequivocal ideal to establish the ideal immunosuppressive regimen for this cohort of patients has been established and the long-term outcome of these recipients has not been delineated.