Hardness is an important mechanical property to express the rubber material’s properties. The hardness is closely related to elastic modulus value that is usually obtained by indentation technique. In elastic modulus investigation, the indentation method is more practical to be applied than tensile test method. Analytically, due to the hyper-elastic and non-linear nature of rubber material, theoretical discussion about the rubber properties is difficult to be performed therefore a numerical method is applied. This paper discusses the investigation of the elastic modulus of tire rubber specimens by indentation method numerically and compares to the tensile test method experimentally. Analysis was carried out by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and two types of vulcanized rubber were analysed. The rubber analysed are often called as a hard compound (vulcanized 1) and soft compound (vulcanized 2) that is commonly used for tires. Indentation modelling was carried out to follow ASTM D 1415-88. Mooney-Rivlin model for Strain Energy Function (SEF) was applied to describe the material’s behaviour. The analysis shows that the results of the indentation method are close to the results of the tensile test method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.