A novel series of hetero-arylboroxines were synthesized and structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction, NMR and computational analysis. The solid-state structures of the hetero-arylboroxines represent the first report of AB(2)-type hetero-arylboroxines.

Density functional theory (B3LYP//6-311+G*) calculations including Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent were applied to study the formation of the trimethylboroxine.amine adduct with respect to methylboronic acid monomers and free amine in solution. Potential intermediates and transition states between intermediates were calculated to assess the thermodynamic and kinetic factors controlling this transformation. Our calculations suggest that the rate-determining steps are condensation reactions to form dimers and trimers, and closure of the boroxine ring. Fast amine exchange is expected throughout the transformation, and the most-stable intermediate is a dimer.amine adduct. Using our calculated barriers for the methyl system as a template, we assess the conversion of phenylboronic acid to the triphenylboroxine.amine adduct and find that the pathway is most likely similar, except that the transformation is thermodynamically and kinetically more favored for the phenyl system in the presence of pyridine.

Heterotrimeric arylboroxines can be favorably formed by designing one of the arylboronic acid monomers to contain a pendant Lewis base. Using density functional theory (B3LYP//6-311+G*) calculations including Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent, we found that AB2 trimeric arylboroxines were thermodynamically favored over A2B, A3, or B3, where A and B are monomeric arylboronic acids with and without a pendant Lewis base, respectively. The most stable AB2 trimers were formed when the B monomer contained electron-withdrawing substituents, particularly halogens in the para-position or pi-acceptors in the meta-position. On the other hand, adding different para-substituents to the A monomer did not significantly change the energetics. Our calculations also suggest that ABC trimers with three different monomers will not be significantly favored over AB2 trimers when making small electronic perturbations, by changing the substituents on each monomer.