This study analyses the effect of the scale-up of electrokinetic remediation (EKR) processes in natural soils. A procedure is proposed to prepare soils based on a compacting process to obtaining soils with similar moisture content and density to those found in real soils in the field. The soil used here was from a region with a high agrarian activity (Mora, Spain). The scale-up study was performed in two installations at different scales: a mock-up pilot scale (0.175m(3)) and a prototype with a scale that was very similar to a real application (16m(3)). The electrode configuration selected consisted of rows of graphite electrodes facing each other located in electrolyte wells. The discharge of 20mg of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [2,4-D] per kg of dry soil was treated by applying an electric potential gradient of 1Vcm(-1). An increase in scale was observed to directly influence the amount of energy supplied to the soil being treated. As a result, electroosmotic and electromigration flows and electric heating are more intense than in smaller-scale tests (24%, 1% and 25%, respectively respect to the values in prototype). In addition, possible leaks were evaluated by conducting a watertightness test and quantifying evaporation losses.
This study focuses on the evaluation of the Electrokinetic Soil Flushing (EKSF) strategy to remediate soil following a simulated spill of the herbicide oxyfluorfen. EKSF is attained by placing (in the soil mockup) two rows of electrodes of different polarity facing each other. The results are compared with those obtained in a reference experiment in which the same spill was simulated and no remediation actions were taken. In addition to the daily monitoring of the most important parameters in the flows, after the remediation test, a post-mortem analysis was performed to obtain a 3-D map of the pollutant distribution. Those results demonstrate that despite the hydrophobic character of oxyfluorfen, it can be efficiently transported by EKSF. Hence, after 34 days of treatment, a 26.8% improvement in the removal of oxyfluorfen was achieved (explained in terms of the effect of the electric field on the pollutant) compared with the reference experiment 2 in which only volatilization can explain the removal of the herbicide. Comparison of the removal of oxyfluorfen by EKSF with that of 2,4-D (studied in a previous study) demonstrates that comparable dragging to the cathode and volatilization are obtained. However, the lower efficiency of the transport of oxyfluorfen by gravity fluxes and electromigration (explained because it is contained as micelles) yielded worse performance of EKSF for this water-insoluble pesticide and hence less efficient remediation. This contradictory result reveals the importance of tests at large-scale facilities such as that used in this work to predict the performance of real systems in future full-scale applications.
This work reports results of the application of electrokinetic fence technology in a 32 m -prototype which contains soil polluted with 2,4-D and oxyfluorfen, focusing on the evaluation of the mechanisms that describe the removal of these two herbicides and comparing results to those obtained in smaller plants: a pilot-scale mockup (175 L) and a lab-scale soil column (1 L). Results show that electric heating of soil (coupled with the increase in the volatility) is the key to explain the removal of pollutants in the largest scale facility while electrokinetic transport processes are the primary mechanisms that explain the removal of herbicides in the lab-scale plant. 2-D and 3-D maps of the temperature and pollutant concentrations are used in the discussion of results trying to give light about the mechanisms and about how the size of the setup can lead to different conclusions, despite the same processes are occurring in the soil.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.