Absorptiometry of the thoraco-lumbar spine at the time of bone densitometry to detect vertebral deformities consistent with fracture is now available. The performance of absorptiometry in clinical practice compared to radiography has not been fully established, especially in the presence of osteoarthritis or scoliosis. Our first objective was to compare absorptiometry to radiography for detection of vertebral deformity in elderly women who were referred for bone densitometry with or without scoliosis or disc space osteoarthritis excluded. Our second objective was to assess the effect of osteoarthritis and scoliosis on the inter-rater reliability of both technologies. The study group comprised two hundred five women age 65 and older referred for bone densitometry in a large multispecialty group practice. Lateral and antero-posterior (AP) absorptiometry images and lateral spine radiographs were obtained on all participants. The vertebrae on all images were evaluated for vertebral deformity by two observers according to the Genant semiquantitative criteria who were blinded to each other's readings. Disc spaces were evaluated on radiographs for osteoarthritis. Absorptiometry AP images were evaluated for scoliosis. In the absence of scoliosis, the sensitivity and specificity of absorptiometry for persons with one or more radiographic grade 2-3 deformities (>25% reduction of vertebral height) for the two readers were 87-93% and 93-95%, respectively. The inter-rater reliability of absorptiometry improved in the absence of moderate or severe disc space osteoarthritis. A strategy of absorptiometry with follow-up radiography only in those with scoliosis or apparent grade 2 deformity accurately identifies those with prevalent grade 2 or 3 deformity on radiography (accuracy 0.98 and kappa 0.86 for reader 1; accuracy 0.99 and kappa 0.92 for reader 2). Lateral and AP absorptiometry imaging of the spine with selective follow-up radiography accurately identifies elderly women with vertebral deformity consistent with moderate or severe fracture, but extra caution is necessary when evaluating vertebrae in the presence of adjacent disc space osteoarthritis.

We compared SQ and ABQ diagnosis of VF imaged by radiography and X-ray absorptiometry. Mild ABQ VF had stronger associations with osteoporosis than mild SQ VF. Interobserver agreement (radiographic diagnosis) was better for ABQ.Introduction: Vertebral fracture (VF) assessment from images acquired by X-ray absorptiometry (VFA) is often based on a semiquantitative approach (SQ); prevalent VF is identified if vertebral height appears reduced by >20%. Algorithm-based qualitative definition of osteoporotic VF (ABQ) requires evidence of endplate depression, and there is no threshold for reduction in vertebral height. The aims of this study were to (1) compare the prevalence of VFs; (2) compare the characteristics of women with and without VFs; (3) compare interobserver agreement; and (4) compare agreement between methods and imaging modalities for ABQ and SQ definitions of VFs. Materials and Methods: Spine radiographs and absorptiometry images for 203 elderly women were assessed using ABQ (readers ABQ-1 and ABQ-2). These readings were compared with SQ assessments (readers SQ-1 and SQ-2) of the same images performed in a previous study. Agreement between readers and methods was assessed by kappa () statistics. Results: The prevalence of VF was 15-18% (radiography) and 12-24% (VFA) for ABQ and SQ, respectively. Women with ABQ or SQ fractures were older and had lower BMD than those without fracture (p < 0.01). Mild ABQ (but not SQ) VF was associated with low BMD. scores for interobserver agreement for radiography and VFA, respectively, were as follows: ABQ, ‫ס‬ 0. Conclusions:The prevalence of radiographic VF identified by ABQ and SQ was similar, but on VFA was 50% higher for SQ. Mild ABQ VF was associated with low BMD. Interobserver agreement for radiographic diagnosis was significantly better for ABQ than for SQ. Agreement between ABQ and SQ was moderate.

No abstract

No abstract