Aims According to cardiovascular outcome trials, some sodium‐glucose contransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RA) are recommended for secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this real‐world study, we compared the simultaneous reductions in HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure after initiation of dapagliflozin or GLP‐1RA as second or a more advanced line of therapy. Materials and methods DARWIN‐T2D was a retrospective multi‐centre study conducted at diabetes specialist clinics in Italy that compared T2D patients who initiated dapagliflozin or GLP‐1RA (exenatide once weekly or liraglutide). Data were collected at baseline and at the first follow‐up visit after 3 to 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a simultaneous reduction in HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure. To reduce confounding, we used multivariable adjustment (MVA) or propensity score matching (PSM). Results Totals of 473 patients initiating dapagliflozin and 336 patients initiating GLP‐1RA were included. The two groups differed in age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, weight and concomitant medications. The median follow‐up was 6 months in both groups. Using MVA or PSM, the primary endpoint was observed in 30% to 32% of patients, with no difference between groups. Simultaneous reduction of HbA1c, BP and SBP by specific threshold, as well as achievement of final goals, did not differ between groups. GLP‐1RA reduced HbA1c by 0.3% more than the reduction achieved with dapagliflozin. Conclusion In routine specialist care, initiation of dapagliflozin can be as effective as initiation of a GLP‐1RA for attainment of combined risk factor goals.
We investigated the effect of 24 h exposure to 100 nmol/l glibenclamide on insulin secretion in isolated rat pancreatic islets. The insulin content was similar in control islets and in islets preincubated with 100 nmol/l glibenclamide for 24 h. In islets preexposed to glibenclamide: 1) the subsequent response to a maximal glibenclamide stimulatory concentration (10 mumol/l, 1 h at 37 C) was greatly reduced in comparison to control islets (0.69 +/- 0.20% vs 2.16 +/- 0.41%; mean +/- SE; n = 14; p less than 0.001); 2) the response to 100 mumol/l tolbutamide stimulation was also reduced (0.55 +/- 0.15% vs 2.38 +/- 0.44%; n = 8; p less than 0.001); 3) the response to 16.7 mmo/l glucose, both in the presence or in the absence of 1 mmol/l IBMX, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was also diminished by about 50% (1.79 +/- 0.39% vs. 3.22 +/- 0.42%; n = 14, p less than 0.001). In glibenclamide pretreated islets, blunted responses to stimuli were confirmed also by dynamic studies using a perifusion system. The effect of glibenclamide preincubation was fully reversible: when islets cultured in the presence of glibenclamide were transferred to a glibenclamide-free medium for further 24 h, insulin release in response to glibenclamide stimulation returned to control values. We conclude that prolonged exposure of rat pancreatic islets to glibenclamide induces a reversible desensitization to a variety of metabolic stimuli. The inhibition by prolonged glibenclamide exposure of a common pathway in the mechanism of insulin release is one possible explanation for these results.
Insulin secretion was studied in rat pancreatic islets after 24-h exposure to various glyburide or tolbutamide concentrations. Glucose-induced insulin release was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in islets cultured with 0.1 microM glyburide or 100 microM tolbutamide (2098 +/- 187, 832 +/- 93, and 989 +/- 88 pg/islet.h in control, glyburide-exposed, and tolbutamide-exposed islets, respectively). When glyburide-treated islets were stimulated with glyburide or tolbutamide, insulin release was also impaired compared to that in control islets (P < 0.05). In contrast, tolbutamide-exposed islets showed an impaired response to tolbutamide, but a normal response to glyburide. To investigate the mechanism of the sulfonylurea-induced impairment of insulin secretion, we measured insulin release and Rb+ efflux (a marker of the K+ channel activity) in a perifusion system and islet Ca2+ uptake under static conditions. Insulin release in response to 16.7 mM glucose increased in control islets from 9.4 +/- 1.1 to 131 +/- 19 pg/islet.min (first phase secretion peak). Simultaneously, the fractional 86Rb+ efflux declined from 0.015 +/- 0.002% to 0.006 +/- 0.001% (change in decrement, -63.5%). Glucose-induced insulin release in glyburide- and tolbutamide-treated islets was significantly reduced (first phase peak, 22.1 +/- 5 and 39.7 +/- 8 pg/islet.min, respectively; P < 0.05), and the fractional 86Rb+ efflux decrement was -21 +/- 6% for glyburide (P < 0.005 vs. control islets) and -65 +/- 4% (not different from control) for tolbutamide. When glyburide- or tolbutamide-exposed islets were stimulated with the corresponding sulfonylurea, insulin release was impaired compared to that in control islets (P < 0.05), but, again, 86Rb+ efflux was impaired (P < 0.05) only in glyburide-exposed islets. When 45Ca2+ uptake was studied, the increase in glucose concentration from 2.8 to 16.7 mM increased calcium uptake in control islets from 1.76 +/- 0.58 to 7.27 +/- 1.36 pmol/islet.2 min (n = 4). Preexposure to 0.1 microM glyburide did not change calcium uptake at a glucose concentration of 2.8 mM (1.44 +/- 0.45 pmol/islet.2 min) but significantly reduced calcium uptake stimulated by 16.7 mM glucose (3.21 +/- 0.35 pmol/islet.2 min; n = 4; P < 0.005 compared to control islets). In contrast, preexposure to 100 microM tolbutamide did not change either basal or glucose-stimulated calcium uptake (1.44 +/- 0.45 and 6.90 +/- 0.81 pmol/islet.2 min, respectively; n = 4). These data show that in vitro chronic exposure of pancreatic islets to the sulfonylureas glyburide and tolbutamide impairs their ability to respond to a subsequent glucose or sulfonylurea stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.