The effects of esmolol at different rates of infusion (100, 250 and 500 micrograms.kg-1 BW.min-1) were compared with beta-adrenoceptor occupancy (beta 1 and beta 2, estimated by a subtype selective radioreceptor assay) and plasma concentrations of esmolol and its acid metabolite were measured by HPLC. Up to a rate of infusion of esmolol of 500 micrograms.kg-1 BW.min-1 there was a maximal beta 1-receptor occupancy of 84.7% while beta 2-receptor occupancy was below the detection limit; confirming the beta 1 selectivity of esmolol. Exercise-induced increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were reduced by esmolol in a dose-dependent manner. The estimated EC50 values of rate of infusion for the reduction in heart rate and systolic blood pressure during exercise were 113 and 134 micrograms.kg-1 BW.min-1, respectively. Additionally, heart rate and systolic blood pressure were reduced moderately at rest. Because of the short elimination half-life of esmolol caused by the rapid hydrolysis to its acid metabolite, 45 min after end of infusion high plasma concentrations of the metabolite (maximally 80 micrograms.ml-1) but no esmolol were detectable. Since no in vivo effects have been observed, despite the presence of high plasma concentrations of the metabolite, the metabolite did not participate in the observed effects up to an infusion rate of esmolol of 500 micrograms.kg-1 BW.min-1. The plasma concentrations of antagonist detected by radioreceptor assay and plasma concentrations of esmolol detected by HPLC showed a good correlation (r = 0.97).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In a paediatric population, we compared i.m. v oral atropine premedication to a control group without atropine and determined atropine plasma concentrations (APC). Forty-five children were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group I received atropine, 20 micrograms.kg-1 i.m., 15 min prior to induction. Group II received atropine, 30 micrograms.kg-1 orally, group III received no atropine. APC (expressed as percent of muscarine-2 receptor subtype occupancy), heart rate, rectal temperature, and salivation were determined before atropine, and 15, 25, 45, 60, 90, 120 (no APC), and 150 min following atropine. Only 10-20% of the M2-cholinoceptors were occupied after oral atropine with a peak at 90 min compared to 60-70% occupancy with a peak 25 min after i.m. atropine. The peak in M2-cholinoceptor occupation in group I was paralleled by a peak percentage change in heart rate of 15% from baseline. The peak in receptor occupation in group II did not correspond to the peak increase in heart rate. The percentage change of heart rate over time was not significantly different from baseline values in any of the groups. Bradycardia or temperature changes did not occur in any of the groups. Antisialogogue effects were observed only in group I. We conclude that atropine; 30 micrograms.kg-1 orally is not an equipotent dosage to atropine, 20 micrograms.kg-1 i.m.

The effects of an oral dose of atropine (0.03 mg/kg body weight) and an IM (0.02 mg/kg) dose on the heart rate and salivary flow in seven healthy adult volunteers were compared to see whether the oral dose was sufficient to inhibit vagal reflexes of the heart. Atropine concentrations in plasma were determined by an M2-selective radioreceptor assay, and the in vitro occupancy of porcine cardiac M2-cholinoceptors was measured in parallel. In ligand-binding studies, atropine has been shown to have a comparable affinity for human and porcine cardiac M2-cholinoceptors (Ki 4.0 and 5.9, respectively). Slight changes in heart rate after oral administration were not significant. After IM administration, however, the heart rate increased significantly, by a maximum of 22 beats.min-1 after 45 min. The slight increase in heart rate after the oral dose corresponded to a receptor occupancy in vitro near the lower limit of detection, whereas the significant increase in heart rate after the IM dose corresponded to a receptor occupancy of up to 47%. The maximum reduction in salivary flow was similar after the oral and IM doses (84.3 and 87.5%, respectively). The almost complete inhibition of salivary flow could be explained by the lower vagal tone in the salivary glands compared with to the heart. The difference in the effect on heart rate was probably due to lower absorption of the oral dose. Thus, an oral dose greater than 0.03 mg atropine/kilogram body weight is required to compensate for low gastrointestinal absorption and to overcome the high vagal tone of the heart.

Effects of AF-DX 116, a cardioselective antagonist, on M cholinergic receptors (M-ChR) were studied in healthy volunteers. Occupancy of M-ChR subtypes by drug present in plasma samples (radioreceptor assay) was compared with these effects. After an intravenous dose of AF-DX 116 saturating greater than 90% of cardiac M2-ChR, an increase in heart rate by 25 beats/min was observed. This cardiac receptor occupancy and effect wore off with a parallel time course within 10 hours. No inhibition of salivary flow was observed, coinciding with a lack of M3-ChR blockade in the radioreceptor assay. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade by propranolol did not affect either of the effects. No indication for active metabolites or stereoselective drug metabolism was found comparing HPLC and receptor assay for drug concentrations in plasma. We conclude that AF-DX 116 may be a useful drug for the treatment of bradycardia. Its lack of troublesome side effects is the result of its selectivity for cardiac M-ChR.