Purpose: To investigate the public attitudes towards Chinese medicine and the impact of the introduction of statutory practitioner registration in Melbourne, Australia. Method: A convenience sample of 575 participants (18-45 years of age) from three locations in Melbourne completed a self-administered, 60-question survey in August 2002. Results: In the previous 12 months, Chinese medicine had been used by 30.9% of the respondents and 17.3% had visited a Chinese medicine practitioner. For each of eight common conditions listed in the survey, between 61.2% and 92.7% of participants indicated that western medicine was their preferred therapeutic option, rather than Chinese medicine or combination of Western and Chinese medicine. However, substantial proportions of participants preferred Chinese medicine for stomach or internal problems (28.4%), cold/flu (18.8%) and dizziness (17.6%). Although 78.2% were aware that statutory practitioner registration had recently been introduced in the State, only 29.9% indicated that they would only visit a registered practitioner. Implication: More stringent surveillance of Chinese medicine service providers and a public education campaign may be necessary to protect against unauthorized Chinese medicine practice.

No abstract

No abstract

Analysis 2.7. Comparison 2 CHM versus drugs, Outcome 7 Total effectiveness rate with posthoc subgroup analysis. Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Combination of oral and topical CHM versus same oral CHM, Outcome 1 Total effectiveness rate (number of participants recovered and significantly improved).. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Combination of oral and topical CHM versus same oral CHM, Outcome 2 Total effectiveness rate (long-term improvement