No abstract

This article details the study protocol for a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of permethrin-treated baby wraps to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in children 6–24 months of age. Participating mother-infant dyads will be randomized to receive either a permethrin-treated or a sham-treated wrap, known locally as a “lesu.” After a baseline home visit, during which time all participants will receive new long-lasting insecticidal nets, participants will attend scheduled clinic visits every two weeks for a period of 24 weeks. In the event of an acute febrile illness or other symptoms that may be consistent with malaria (e.g., poor feeding, headache, malaise), participants will be instructed to present to their respective study clinic for evaluation. The primary outcome of interest is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic malaria in participating children. Secondary outcomes of interest include: (1) change in children’s hemoglobin levels; (2) change in children’s growth parameters; (3) prevalence of asymptomatic parasitemia in children; (4) hospitalization for malaria in children; (5) change in the mother’s hemoglobin level; and (6) clinical malaria in the mother. Analyses will be conducted using a modified intent-to-treat approach, with woman-infant dyads who attend one or more clinic visits analyzed according to the arm to which they were randomly assigned. This is the first use of an insecticide-treated baby wrap for prevention of malaria in children. The study began recruitment in June 2022 and is ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05391230, Registered 25 May 2022.

IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission frequently occurs within households, yet few studies describe which household contacts and household units are most likely to engage in transmission-interrupting behaviors.MethodsWe analyzed a COVID-19 prospective household transmission cohort in North Carolina (April to October 2020) to quantify changes in physical distancing behaviors among household contacts over 14 days. We evaluated which household contacts were most likely to ever mask at home and to ever share a bedroom with the index case between days 7–14.ResultsIn the presence of a household COVID-19 infection, 24% of household contacts reported ever masking at home during the week before study entry. Masking in the home between days 7–14 was reported by 26% of household contacts and was more likely for participants who observed their household index case wearing a mask. Participants of color and participants in high-density households were more likely to mask at home. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, living density was not as clearly associated with masking. Symptomatic household contacts were more likely to share a bedroom with the index case. Working individuals and those with comorbidities avoided sharing a bedroom with the index case.DiscussionIn-home masking during household exposure to COVID-19 was infrequent in 2020. In light of the ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, these findings underscore a need for health campaigns to increase the feasibility and social desirability of in-home masking among exposed household members. Joint messaging on social responsibility and prevention of breakthrough infections, reinfections, and long COVID-19 may help motivate transmission-interruption behaviors.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 transmission frequently occurs within households, yet few studies describe which household contacts and household units are most likely to engage in transmission-interrupting behaviors. Methods: We analyzed a COVID-19 prospective household transmission cohort in North Carolina (April-Oct 2020) to quantify changes in physical distancing behaviors among household contacts over 14 days. We evaluated which household contacts were most likely to ever mask at home and to ever share a bedroom with the index case between Days 7-14. Results: In the presence of a household COVID-19 infection, 24% of household contacts reported ever masking at home during the week before study entry. Masking in the home between Days 7-14 was reported by 26% of household contacts, and was more likely for participants who observed their household index case wearing a mask. Participants of color and participants in high-density households were more likely to mask at home. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, living density was not as clearly associated with masking. Symptomatic household contacts were more likely to share a bedroom with the index case. Working individuals and those with comorbidities avoided sharing a bedroom with the index case. Conclusion: In-home masking during household exposure to COVID-19 was infrequent in 2020. In light of ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, these findings underscore a need for health campaigns to increase the feasibility and social desirability of in-home masking among exposed household members. Joint messaging on social responsibility and prevention of breakthrough infections, reinfections, and long COVID-19 may help motivate transmission-interruption behaviors.