An initial review (PCET1) on proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) by Huynh and Meyer appeared in Chemical Reviews in 2007. 1 This is a perennial review, a follow up on the original. It was intended for the special Chemical Reviews edition on Proton Coupled Electron Transfer that appeared in December, 2010 (Volume 110, Issue 12 Pages 6937-710). The reader is referred to it with articles on electrochemical approaches to studying PCET by Costentin and coworkers, 2 theory of electron proton transfer reactions by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers, 3 proton-coupled electron flow in proteins and enzymes by Gray and coworkers, 4 and the thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer by Mayer and coworkers. 5 Coverage for the current review is intended to be broad, covering all aspects of the topic comprehensively with literature coverage overlapping with the later references in PCET1 until late 2010. There is a growing understanding of the importance of PCET in chemistry and biology and its implications for catalysis and energy conversion. This has led to a series of informative reviews that have appeared since 2007. They include: "The possible role of Proton-coupled electron Transfer (PCET) in Water oxidation by Photosystem II" by Meyer and coworkers in 2007, 6 "Theoretical studies of proton-coupled electron transfer: Models and concepts relevant to bioenergetics" by Hammes-Schiffer and coworkers in 2008, 7 "Electrochemical Approach to the Mechanistic Study of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer" by Costentin in 2008, 8 "Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Biology: Results from Synergistic Studies in Natural and Model Systems" by Nocera and Reece in 2009, 9 and "Integrating Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer and Excited States" by Meyer and coworkers in 2010. 10

Isomorphous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) based on {M[4,4'-(HO(2)C)(2)-bpy](2)bpy}(2+) building blocks (where M = Ru or Os) were designed and synthesized to study the classic Ru to Os energy transfer process that has potential applications in light-harvesting with supramolecular assemblies. The crystalline nature of the MOFs allows precise determination of the distances between metal centers by X-ray diffraction, thereby facilitating the study of the Ru→Os energy transfer process. The mixed-metal MOFs with 0.3, 0.6, 1.4, and 2.6 mol % Os doping were also synthesized in order to study the energy transfer dynamics with a two-photon excitation at 850 nm. The Ru lifetime at 620 nm decreases from 171 ns in the pure Ru MOF to 29 ns in the sample with 2.6 mol % Os doping. In the mixed-metal samples, energy transfer was observed with an initial growth in Os emission corresponding with the rate of decay of the Ru excited state. These results demonstrate rapid, efficient energy migration and long distance transfer in isomorphous MOFs.

No abstract

Microscale metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were synthesized from photoactive Ru(II)-bpy building blocks with strong visible light absorption and long-lived triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer ((3)MLCT) excited states. These MOFs underwent efficient luminescence quenching in the presence of either oxidative or reductive quenchers. Up to 98% emission quenching was achieved with either an oxidative quencher (1,4-benzoquinone) or a reductive quencher (N,N,N',N'-tetramethylbenzidine), as a result of rapid energy migration over several hundred nanometers followed by efficient electron transfer quenching at the MOF/solution interface. The photoactive MOFs act as an excellent light-harvesting system by combining intraframework energy migration and interfacial electron transfer quenching.

Amplified luminescence quenching has been demonstrated in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) composed of Ru(II)-bpy building blocks with long-lived, largely triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited states. Strong non-covalent interactions between the MOF surface and cationic quencher molecules coupled with rapid energy transfer through the MOF microcrystal facilitates amplified quenching with a 7000-fold enhancement of the Stern-Völmer quenching constant for methylene blue compared to a model complex.