IntroductionTreatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) plays a substantial role in the prevention of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB). However, clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of preventive therapy for presumed multidrug-resistant (MDR) LTBI are lacking. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the antibiotic levofloxacin in preventing the development of active TB among latently infected contacts of index patients with MDR-TB.Methods and analysisA double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 10 provinces of Vietnam. Household contacts living with patients with bacteriologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or MDR-TB will be eligible for recruitment if they have a positive tuberculin skin test or are known to be immunosuppressed, and do not have active TB. Participants will be randomised to receive either levofloxacin or placebo tablets once per day for 6 months. Screening for incident TB will be performed at 6 months intervals. The primary study outcome is the incidence of bacteriologically confirmed TB within 30 months after randomisation. Analysis will be by intention to treat, using Poisson regression.EthicsEthical approval from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained on 29 April 2015 (2014/929), and from the Vietnam Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board on 30 September 2015 (4040/QD-BYT).DisseminationFindings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberACTRN12616000215426.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to people with TB substantially elevates a person's risk of tuberculous infection and TB disease. Systematic screening of TB contacts enables the early detection and treatment of co‐prevalent disease, and the opportunity to prevent future TB disease. However, scale‐up of contact investigation in high TB transmission settings remains limited.METHODS: We undertook a narrative review to evaluate the evidence for contact investigation and identify strategies that TB programmes may consider when introducing contact investigation and management.RESULTS: Selection of contacts for priority screening depends upon their proximity and duration of exposure, along with their susceptibility to develop TB. Screening algorithms can be tailored to the target population, the availability of diagnostic tests and preventive therapy, and healthcare worker expertise. Contact investigation may be performed in the household or at communal locations. Local contact investigation policies should support vulnerable patients, and ensure that drop‐out during screening can be mitigated. Ethical issues should be anticipated and addressed in each setting.CONCLUSION: Contact investigation is an important strategy for TB elimination. While its epidemiological impact will be greatest in lower‐transmission settings, the early detection and prevention of TB have important benefits for contacts and their communities.