The effects of neomycin and cholestyramine on the disposition of lorazepam was examined in seven healthy drug-free men. Half-life as determined for the oral route was, in all subjects, 15% to 35% less than that determined for the intravenous route. Free oral clearance was slightly but not significantly less than free systemic clearance, but the ratio of the AUC of lorazepam glucuronide corrected for dose was twofold greater by the oral route. Urinary recoveries also differed (71.6% and 50.4%, oral versus intravenous). Neomycin and cholestyramine treatment resulted in a 19% to 26% reduction in half-life attendant on a 34% increase in free oral clearance and a 24% increase in free systemic clearance. This suggests that lorazepam undergoes significant enterohepatic recirculation in human beings and that there exists an extrahepatic pathway, at least for the intravenous route. Since pharmacokinetic measurements do not take these physiologic processes into account, the drug cannot properly be used as a marker of conjugative metabolism.
The effects of fasting and feeding of a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet on the glucuronidation and enterohepatic circulation (EHC) of lorazepam were examined in seven healthy men (age 18-30 years) and seven matched patients with Gilbert's syndrome. A simultaneous intravenous/oral dosing regimen was used, with half of each group receiving treatment with neomycin and cholestyramine (neo/chol) to block the EHC of the drug. Feeding increased the clearance of free lorazepam from 10.96 +/- 0.56 (mean +/- SD) to 14.11 +/- 1.21 mL/min/kg (P = 0.05) in patients with Gilbert's syndrome when examined in the presence of neo/chol. Clearances, on the other hand, decreased with feeding in control Gilbert's patients (7.61 +/- 0.54 versus 8.82 +/- 0.48 mL/min/kg), although the differences were not significant (P = 0.09). In contrast to both of these groups, feeding decreased lorazepam clearances (13.33 +/- 0.32 to 12.45 +/- 0.52 mL/min/kg, P = 0.17) in neo/chol-treated normals and increased clearances (9.95 +/- 1.84 to 12.38 +/- 2.05 mL/min/kg, P = 0.04) in control normals. Lorazepam clearances were also 20-40% lower in patients with Gilbert's syndrome compared with normals when studied fasting and with neo/chol, or fed and in the control state (P < 0.05 for both). Thus, the glucuronidation and EHC of lorazepam is sensitive both to diet and to the presence or absence of the Gilbert's trait.
The pharmacokinetics of lorazepam was examined in 10 male patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before and following treatment with neomycin and cholestyramine. Neomycin and cholestyramine were given in an attempt to block the enterohepatic circulation of lorazepam and so to permit an in vivo estimate of hepatic glucuronidation. The volume of distribution and clearance of free lorazepam in diabetic patients were not significantly different from the corresponding estimates in 14 normal controls. Neomycin and cholestyramine increased the clearance of lorazepam by 63% consistent with their effect in non-diabetic controls. However, patients on beef/pork insulin exhibited a greater than normal increase on this interupting regimen (125%), and had a significantly greater neomycin/cholestyramine cycling-interrupted clearance of lorazepam than either normal controls or patients on human insulin (15.4 vs. 6.96 and 7.87 ml.min-1.kg-1). The clearance was correlated positively and significantly with HbA1c and glycated proteins (fructosamine), but only in patients on human insulin. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of lorazepam was not altered in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. However, it is possible that there are differences in the rate and extent of hepatic glucuronidation and enterohepatic circulation of lorazepam between patients treated with beef/pork and human insulins and between diabetics treated with beef/pork insulin and non-diabetic controls.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.