Objective To compare the complication rate associated with synchronous prosthesis insertion at the time of radical orchidectomy with orchidectomy alone. Patient and Methods All men undergoing radical orchidectomy for testis cancer in the North West Region of England between April 1999 to July 2005 and November 2007 to November 2009 were included. Data on postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), re‐admission rate and return to theatre rate were collected. Results In all, 904 men [median (range) age 35 (14–88) years], underwent a radical orchidectomy during the study period and 413 (46.7%) were offered a prosthesis, of whom 55.2% chose to receive one. Those offered a prosthesis were significantly younger (P < 0.001), with a median age of 33 vs 37 years. There was no significant difference between the groups for LOS (P = 0.387), hospital re‐admission rates (P = 0.539) or return to theatre rate (P = 0.999). In all, 33/885 patients were readmitted ≤30 days of orchidectomy, with one of 236 prosthesis patients requiring prosthesis removal (0.4%). Older age at orchidectomy was associated with an increased risk of 30‐day hospital re‐admission (odds ratio 1.032, P = 0.016). Conclusions Concurrent insertion of a testicular prosthesis does not increase the complication rate of radical orchidectomy as determined by LOS, re‐admission or the need for further surgery. Prosthesis insertion at the time of orchidectomy for testis cancer is safe and concerns about increased complications should not constrain the offer of testicular prosthesis insertion concurrently with primary surgery.

ObjectiveTo report a simplified and effective method for substratification of M1 castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) by correlating progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with simple quantification of skeletal metastases. Patients and MethodsIn all, 561 men with M1 CRPC were studied longitudinally. Individual bone scan disease burden, quantified by counting bone metastasis number, was correlated with clinical outcome using specific threshold points of 1-4, 5-20 and >20 detectable lesions. ResultsPatients with a higher metastasis number had a shorter PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-2.4; P < 0.001). Patients with 1-4 metastases had much better PFS and OS than those with 5-20 metastases. The median PFS and OS in the latter was 10.9 (95% CI 8.4-12.8) and 22.1 (95% CI: 18.5-24.5) months, respectively. PFS and OS for patients with >20 metastases were shorter still [median 5.3 (95% CI 3.4-6.9) months and 13.3 (95% CI 11.3-17.6) months, respectively]. Dichotomising into cohorts with 1-4 and ≥5 metastases, the latter group had considerably poorer PFS [8.4 (95% CI 6.8-10.3) months; P < 0.001) and OS [18.7 (95% CI 17.5-22.1) months; P < 0.001]. ConclusionsDichotomising patients with CRPC into cohorts with 1-4 or ≥5 skeletal metastases identifies a better and a worse cohort in a manner that is easy and clinically accessible. This simple method facilitates disease stratification and patient management, enabling clinicians to counsel patients more effectively about long-term outcomes and to help select intervention therapies more effectively.

No abstract

iGFR measurement is recommended following ileal conduit urinary diversion if early signs of renal function loss are to be detected. eGFR overestimates GFR in critically relevant ranges and fails to detect loss in a clinically significant proportion of patients.