There is considerable interest within the public health community in the evaluation of programs intended to reduce health disparities. This commentary discusses an attempt to evaluate a prenatal clinic in a community-based organization serving disadvantaged African American women. The staff members of the clinic were convinced that the birth outcomes of their patients were better than might be expected from national data. The available data, however, were insufficient to permit a clear conclusion regarding the effectiveness of this clinical service. Nonetheless, data from focus groups conducted among staff members and current clients of the clinic suggested some reasons why birth outcomes might be better in this clinic. These reasons were supported both by the stress and coping literature and by empirical research into the determinants of birth outcomes. The article concludes with a discussion of some of the issues that need to be addressed by evaluators working in community-based organizations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.