Although Q fever is considered enzootic in the United States, surveillance for human Q fever has been historically limited. From 1978 through 1999, 436 cases (average = 20 per year) of human Q fever were reported. After Q fever became nationally reportable in 1999, 255 human Q fever cases (average = 51 per year) were reported with illness onset during 2000 through 2004. The median age of cases was 51 years, and most cases were male (77%). The average annual incidence of Q fever was 0.28 cases per million persons, and was highest in persons 50-59 years of age (0.39 cases per million). State-specific incidence ranged from a high of 2.40 cases per million persons in Wyoming, to 0 cases in some states. Since Q fever became reportable, case reports have increased by more than 250%. Surveillance for Q fever is essential to establish the distribution and magnitude of disease and to complement U.S. bioterrorism preparedness activities.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among troops training at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, from May through June 1997, to identify infections caused by tick-borne pathogens. Serum samples were tested by IFAs for antibodies to selected Rickettsia and Ehrlichia species and by an investigational EIA for spotted fever group Rickettsia lipopolysaccharide antigens. Of 1,067 guardsmen tested, 162 (15.2%) had antibodies to one or more pathogens. Of 93 guardsmen with paired serum samples, 33 seroconverted to Rickettsia rickettsii or spotted fever group rickettsiae (SFGR) and five to Ehrlichia species. Most (84.8%) of the personnel who seroconverted to SFGR were detected only by EIA, and seropositivity was significantly associated with an illness compatible with a tick-borne disease. In addition, 34 (27%) of 126 subjects with detectable antibody titers reported a compatible illness. The primary risk factor for confirmed or probable disease was finding > 10 ticks on the body. Doxycycline use and rolling up of long sleeves were protective against seropositivity. The risk of transmission of tick-borne pathogens at Fort Chaffee remains high, and use of the broadly reactive EIA suggests that previous investigations may have underestimated the risk for infection by SFGR. Measures to prevent tick bite and associated disease may require reevaluation.

No abstract

Surgical staff transmitted B. pertussis among themselves; self-reported data suggests that these HCWs did not transmit B. pertussis to their patients, likely because of mask use, cough etiquette, and limited face-to-face contact. Control measures might have helped limit the outbreak once pertussis was recognized.