No abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate and quantify the future risk of cardiovascular events in young adults with high blood pressure.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 6 March 2020. Relative risks were pooled using a random effects model and expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Absolute risk difference was calculated. Dose-response relations between blood pressure and individual outcomes were assessed by a restricted cubic spline model.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies were selected that investigated the adverse outcomes of adults aged 18-45 with raised blood pressure. The primary study outcome was a composite of total cardiovascular events. Coronary heart disease, stroke, and all cause mortality were examined as secondary outcomes.ResultsSeventeen observational cohorts consisting of approximately 4.5 million young adults were included in the analysis. The average follow-up was 14.7 years. Young adults with normal blood pressure had increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with those with optimal blood pressure (relative risk 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.31; risk difference 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.61 per 1000 person years). A graded, progressive association was found between blood pressure categories and increased risk of cardiovascular events (high normal blood pressure: relative risk 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.49; risk difference 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.97 per 1000 person years; grade 1 hypertension: 1.92, 1.68 to 2.19; 1.81, 1.34 to 2.34; grade 2 hypertension: 3.15, 2.31 to 4.29; 4.24, 2.58 to 6.48). Similar results were observed for coronary heart disease and stroke. Generally, the population attributable fraction for cardiovascular events associated with raised blood pressure was 23.8% (95% confidence interval 17.9% to 28.8%). The number needed to treat for one year to prevent one cardiovascular event was estimated at 2672 (95% confidence interval 1639 to 6250) for participants with normal blood pressure, 1450 (1031 to 2326) for those with high normal blood pressure, 552 (427 to 746) for those with grade 1 hypertension, and 236 (154 to 388) for those with grade 2 hypertension.ConclusionsYoung adults with raised blood pressure might have a slightly increased risk of cardiovascular events in later life. Because the evidence for blood pressure lowering is limited, active interventions should be cautious and warrant further investigation.

The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-angiotensin-(1–7)-MAS axis (ACE2-Ang-[1–7]-MAS axis) plays an important role in the control of blood pressure. Some previous studies indicated that the genetic variants of ACE2 may have a potential to influence this axis. Therefore, the present study aimed at examining the association of ACE2 polymorphisms with circulating ACE2 and Ang-(1–7) levels in patients with essential hypertension.Hypertensive patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the present study. Three Tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2106809, rs4646155, and rs879922) in ACE2 gene were genotyped for all participants. Circulating ACE2 and Ang-(1–7) levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.There were 96 (53.0%) females and 85 (47.0%) males participating in the present study. The circulating Ang-(1–7) levels were significantly greater in female patients carrying the rs2106809 CC or CT genotype compared with those carrying the TT genotype (1321.9 ± 837.4 or 1077.5 ± 804.4 pg/mL vs 751.9 ± 612.4 pg/mL, respectively; P = 0.029, analysis of variance), whereas the circulating Ang-(1–7) levels were comparable among genotypes in male patients. In addition, there was no significant difference in the circulating ACE2 levels among rs2106809 CC, CT, and TT genotype groups in both female and male patients. The circulating ACE2 and Ang-(1–7) levels were related to neither rs4646155 nor rs879922 in female or male patients.In conclusion, the rs2106809 polymorphism of the ACE2 gene may be a determinant of the circulating Ang-(1–7) level in female patients with hypertension, suggesting a genetic association between circulating Ang-(1–7) levels and ACE2 gene polymorphisms in patients with hypertension.