Background-Long-term survival data on de novo malignancy are limited following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) when compared with controls without malignancies.

Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease is a recently coined systemic disease characterized by specific histopathologic findings of an intense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, and obliterative phlebitis in the presence of predominant IgG4-positive plasma cells. Although IgG4-related disease has been described in many organs, involvement of the esophagus is very rare. In this study, we describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of eight patients with IgG4-related esophagitis. We evaluated chronic esophagitis specimens with lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate obtained over the past 6 years (from January 2011 to February 2017) using a chart review, pathologic examination, and IgG4 immunohistochemical staining. The diagnoses of the specimens were either confirmed as IgG4-related esophagitis (IgG4-RE) or chronic esophagitis, not otherwise specified (CENOS), and the clinicopathologic data from each group were compared. Eight patients were diagnosed with IgG4-RE and 10 controls were identified and diagnosed with CENOS. In the IgG4-RE group, esophageal strictures were identified in three patients, two patients had postmyotomy treated achalasia, one patient had erosive esophagitis and another presented with an esophageal nodule. Only one patient had an unremarkable mucosa on endoscopy. In the CENOS group, four patients had esophageal strictures, six had erosive esophagitis, one patient had mild esophagitis. The IgG4-RE group had significantly higher numbers of IgG4-positive plasma cells (66.9 ± 21.9 vs. 4.7 ± 2.4 per high power field; P< 0.001) and a greater IgG4: IgG ratio 0.76 ± 0.13 vs. 0.06 ± 0.05; P< 0.001) when compared to CENOS patients. Two of the patients with recurrent esophageal strictures in the IgG4-RE group showed initial response to steroid therapy and are currently on immunosuppressive therapy which has significantly reduced the need for multiple esophageal dilatations. The presentation of IgG4-related esophageal disease can vary and the key to diagnosis is dependent on histopathology. These observations highlight the need for IgG4 immunohistochemical staining of esophageal biopsies especially in patients with mucosal ulceration, chronic inflammation, and plasmacytosis on biopsy. This will prevent unwarranted esophagectomies and failed medical treatment due to lack of recognition of this entity.

Drug-induced liver disease remains an important cause of acute liver failure, and research efforts by the National Institutes of Health and others are underway to better determine the risk factors and other host susceptibilities that will allow for the safer use of drugs in the future.

The present study investigated the effect of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bf-6 (LMG 24 384) (Bf-6)-supplemented yogurt on colonic transit time (CTT). A triple-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over trial was conducted with sixty-eight women with a self-reported history of straining during bowel movements or hard or lumpy stools in the past 2 years. As per regulatory requirements for probiotic studies, eligible women were generally healthy and not actively constipated at the time of enrolment. Participants consumed both Bf-6 and placebo yogurts for 14 d each in a randomised order, with a 6-week washout period between the treatments. The primary outcome, CTT, was assessed via Sitz marker X-rays. The average CTT was 42·1 h for the active period and 43·3 h for the control period (mean difference 1·2 h, 95 % CI 24·9, 7·4). Since the statistical tests for the cross-over study implied that the mean CTT for the active and control periods in period 2 were biased, the standard protocol suggests examining the results of only period 1 as a traditional randomised controlled trial. This showed that the mean CTT was 35·2 h for the active period v. 52·9 h for the control period (P¼ 0·015). Bootstrapping demonstrated that both the mean and median differences remained significant (P¼ 0·016 and P¼ 0·045, respectively). Few adverse events were noted, with no differences among the active and control periods. The paired analysis showed no differences between the active and control periods during the cross-over trial. Further trials should be conducted in populations with underlying problems associated with disordered transit to determine the potential value of probiotic supplementation more accurately.