Tracheobronchial clearance was studied twice in 16 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis after inhalation of 6 microns (aerodynamic diameter) monodisperse Teflon particles labeled with 111In. At one exposure the particles were inhaled at an extremely slow flow, 0.05 L/s; at the other they were inhaled at a normal flow, 0.5 L/s. Theoretical calculations and experimental data in healthy subjects indicate particle deposition mainly in the smallest ciliated airways using 0.05 L/s, i.e., in the bronchiolar region, and an enhanced deposition in larger airways using 0.5 L/s. Lung retention was measured at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Clearance was significantly every 24 h for both exposures (p < .05). The fractions of retained particles were significantly larger for particles inhaled at 0.05 L/s compared to 0.5 L/s at all points of time (p < .001). Compared to healthy subjects, the retained fractions of deposited particles were larger in patients with bronchitis breathing at 0.05 L/s, but smaller with breathing at 0.5 L/s (p < .01). Significant relationships were found between lung retentions and airway resistance (Raw) at 0.5 L/s, r = -.68 (p < .01), but not at 0.05 L/s, and between lung retention at 24 h and weight of expectorated sputum at 0.05 L/s, r = -.50 (p < .05). There was, furthermore, an almost significant relationship between sputum volume and rate of tracheobronchial clearance between 0 and 24 h (in percentage of the total amount cleared during 72 h) at 0.05 L/s, r = .42 (p = .05). The results indicate that in patients with chronic bronchitis overall clearance of particles in small airways is incomplete, as compared to larger airways. An increased amount of mucus, however, seemed to improve clearance of peripherally deposited particles, possibly by making cough more effective in small airways.
Smokers with chronic bronchitis and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been reported to have an increased bronchial reactivity (BR). It has been discussed whether increased BR is a risk factor for the development of COPD in smokers. We studied 10 monozygotic twin pairs who were discordant for tobacco smoking by means of histamine provocation tests, lung function tests, and serum samples for total IgE. The smokers had a mild obstructive ventilatory impairment, with FEV1 significantly lower than that of the partner both when it was determined from the flow-volume loops (3.2 +/- 1.0 L for smokers and 3.4 +/- 0.8 L for nonsmokers) and by the Vitalograph spirometer (3.5 +/- 1.0 L for smokers and 3.8 +/- 0.8 L for nonsmokers). Forced midexpiratory flow (FEF25-75%) and forced expiratory flow at 75 to 85% of vital capacity (FEF75-85%) were both significantly lower in the smokers (p < 0.05). The alveolar plateau phase N2-delta test and lung clearing index in the multibreath nitrogen washout test were both significantly affected in the smokers (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). We found no significant difference in histamine reactivity between smokers and nonsmokers and no correlation between differences in reactivity and differences in lung function within pairs. Total serum IgE was significantly higher in the smokers than in their nonsmoking siblings. These data suggest that obstructive ventilatory impairment and raised serum IgE are earlier and more constant manifestations of tobacco smoking than increased bronchial reactivity. Thus, bronchial hyperreactivity does not seem to be a major risk factor for the development of early airways obstruction in smokers.
Tracheobronchial clearance and bronchial reactivity were studied in 6 asthma-discordant monozygotic twin pairs, and in 3 concordant pairs as controls. Clearance of 6-µm Teflon particles labeled with 99mTc was followed for 2 h. The results indicate that clearance in the larger airways is usually not severely impaired in mild to moderate asthma, and that it may be increased as well as decreased. Bronchial reactivity correlated with clearance in the nonasthmatics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.