Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) Background E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. Results Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR= 0.51, 95% CI=(0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR=1.03, 95% CI=(1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(-3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI=(2.27, 4.15), p < 0.001). As nutrition status declined, the distress score increased (95%CI=(0.88, 1.68), p < 0.001). Of the patients, 48.8% who were both distressed and malnourished requested supportive care to address their problems. Conclusion Patient-reported assessments utilizing E-health tools are an accurate and efficient method to encourage patient participation in cancer care while simultaneously ensuring that regular assessment of psycho-social and nutritional aspects of care are efficiently integrated in the daily clinical routine.

No abstract

Beginning progestin-only contraception immediately following mifepristone for early medical abortion was not associated with reduced medical abortion effectiveness.

No abstract

To evaluate maternal mortality and changes in the culture of safety before and after the implementation of the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) Malawi program. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study at a central hospital and a district health center in Malawi from March 2016 to November 2017. The AIM Malawi program included classroom didactics on obstetric hemorrhage, teamwork protocols, skills laboratory activities, and simulation training. The time periods of comparison were preintervention, education period, and postintervention. Hospital birth paper records were used to collect data on patient demographics and obstetric and neonatal information. The Hospital Survey of Patient Safety was used to measure the culture of safety before and after the program. RESULTS:We trained 128 participants. In the postintervention period, 16 procedural interventions were performed to manage postpartum hemorrhage, including B-lynch sutures (n57), condom balloon catheter (n55), nonpneumatic antishock garment (n53), and uterine artery ligation (n51). There was a significant increase in the use of B-lynch sutures for the management of uterine atony in the postintervention compared with preintervention period (P5.014). In the postintervention period, the rate of maternal mortality from obstetric hemorrhage decreased significantly from 1.2% to 0.2% (P5.02), a relative decrease of 82.1% from the preintervention rate. Hospital safety culture scores improved significantly from baseline in four out of five domains after the AIM Malawi training.CONCLUSION: After implementation of the AIM Malawi program, we found an increased use of postpartum hemorrhage procedural interventions, a decreased rate of maternal mortality and an increase in Hospital Survey of Patient Safety composite safety scores. The AIM Malawi program may be an effective framework for adaptation to improve maternal mortality in a lowresource setting.