BACKGROUNDSpinal muscular atrophy is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder that is caused by an insufficient level of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide drug that modifies pre-messenger RNA splicing of the SMN2 gene and thus promotes increased production of full-length SMN protein. METHODSWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of nusinersen in infants with spinal muscular atrophy. The primary end points were a motor-milestone response (defined according to results on the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination) and event-free survival (time to death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation). Secondary end points included overall survival and subgroup analyses of event-free survival according to disease duration at screening. Only the first primary end point was tested in a prespecified interim analysis. To control the overall type I error rate at 0.05, a hierarchical testing strategy was used for the second primary end point and the secondary end points in the final analysis. RESULTSIn the interim analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the nusinersen group than in the control group had a motor-milestone response (21 of 51 infants [41%] vs. 0 of 27 [0%], P<0.001), and this result prompted early termination of the trial. In the final analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the nusinersen group than in the control group had a motor-milestone response (37 of 73 infants [51%] vs. 0 of 37 [0%]), and the likelihood of event-free survival was higher in the nusinersen group than in the control group (hazard ratio for death or the use of permanent assisted ventilation, 0.53; P = 0.005). The likelihood of overall survival was higher in the nusinersen group than in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.37; P = 0.004), and infants with a shorter disease duration at screening were more likely than those with a longer disease duration to benefit from nusinersen. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONSAmong infants with spinal muscular atrophy, those who received nusinersen were more likely to be alive and have improvements in motor function than those in the control group. Early treatment may be necessary to maximize the benefit of the drug. (Funded by Biogen and Ionis Pharmaceuticals; ENDEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02193074.)

No abstract

Severe neurologic complications are frequent (14%) among children receiving HSCT, causing 8.5% of deaths after transplant. Transplant from allogeneic donor, especially if unrelated, the development of severe acute GvHD grade >2, and the use of TBI in the preparative regimen are the main risk factors for such complications.

10014 Background: We determined the role of scIL-2 combined with long term infusion (LTI) of DB in patients (pts) with high-risk relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Methods: 160 pts were enrolled into an open label SIOPEN Phase II clinical trial (EudraCT 2009-018077-31). Pts were randomly assigned to receive up to 5 cycles of 100 mg/m2 DB-LTI (d8-17) and 160 mg/m2 oral isotretinoin (d19-32) (81 pts) with and without 6x106IU/m2 scIL-2 (d1-5; 8-12) (79 pts). Endpoints were toxicity, response rates and 2yrs-event free and -overall survival. Results: Between 07/2014 and 07/2017, 160 pts from 11 countries were randomised. Median follow-up is 2.6 years. Pts were well balanced between arms according to stage, age, MYCN amplification, patients with relapse and remission status. The 2yrs-EFS and -OS for DB (81 pts) vs. DB combined with scIL-2 (79 pts) was 59%±6% vs 65%±6% (p = 0.721) and 79%±5% vs 84%±4% (p = 0.904). In 97 pts with evaluable disease, a response rate of 49% (9% CR, 40% PR) vs 52% (26% CR, 26% PR) after treatment with DB vs DB and scIL-2 was observed. Grade 3&4 fever (16% vs 46%, P = 0.000), allergic reaction (1% vs 14%, P = 0.004), hematological toxicity (46% vs 66%, P = 0.013) and neurotoxicity (0% vs 8%, p = 0.003) were significantly worse in the combination arm, but no difference was seen for capillary leak, gastrointestinal, liver enzyme elevation and pain. Paraplegia possibly related to the treatment was observed in 2 pts in the combination arm, none in the arm without scIL-2, and one resolved to baseline. A subgroup of 34 pts who had a relapse and measurable disease at treatment start, showed a 2yrs-EFS and -OS in DB (17 pts) vs DB combined with scIL-2 (17 pts) of 35%±12% vs 69%±12% (p = 0.116) and 59%±12% vs 81%±10% (p = 0.167). However, this trend was statistically not significant. Pharmacokinetic and HACA response between both arms was not different with overlapping antibody concentration-time curves and a HACA response of 15/81 (19%) (DB) vs 16/79 (20%) (DB and scIL-2). Conclusions: No significant difference in efficacy of DB combined with scIL-2 and increased toxicity in this arm suggests that this schedule of scIL-2 is of no additional benefit. Clinical trial information: 2009-018077-31.