Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous-infusion (CI) meropenem and microbiological outcome in critical COVID-19 patients with documented Gram-negative superinfections. Methods: Patients receiving CI meropenem for documented Gram-negative infections at the COVID ICU of the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring from January 2021 to February 2022 were retrospectively assessed. Average steady-state meropenem concentrations (Css) were calculated and the Css/MIC ratio was selected as a pharmacodynamic parameter of meropenem efficacy. The Css/MIC ratio was defined as optimal if ≥4, quasi-optimal if between 1 and 4, and suboptimal if <1. The relationship between Css/MIC and microbiological outcome was assessed. Results: Overall, 43 critical COVID-19 patients with documented Gram-negative infections were retrieved. Combination therapy was implemented in 26 cases. Css/MIC ratios were optimal in 27 (62.8%), quasi-optimal in 7 (16.3%), and suboptimal in 9 cases (20.9%). Microbiological failure occurred in 21 patients (48.8%), with no difference between monotherapy and combination therapy (43.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.53). The microbiological failure rate was significantly lower in patients with an optimal Css/MIC ratio compared to those with a quasi-optimal or suboptimal Css/MIC ratio (33.3% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Suboptimal attainment of meropenem PK/PD targets may be a major determinant impacting on microbiological failure in critical COVID-19 patients with Gram-negative superinfections.

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is necessary for dose adjustments of beta-lactam that are excreted by the kidneys, such as meropenem. The aim of this study was to compare the daily dose of 24 h-continuous infusion (CI) meropenem when GFR was calculated by means of measured creatinine clearance (mCLCR) or estimated by the CKDEPI (eGFRCKDEPI), Cockcroft–Gault (eGFRCG), and MDRD (eGFRMDRD) equations. Adult critically ill patients who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for the assessment of 24 h-CI meropenem steady state concentration (Css) and for whom a 24 h-urine collection was performed were retrospectively enrolled. Meropenem clearance (CLM) was regressed against mCLCR, and meropenem daily dose was calculated based on the equation infusion rate = daily dose/CLM. eGFRCKDEPI, eGFRCG, and eGFRCKDEPI were regressed against mCLCR in order to estimate CLM. Forty-six patients who provided 133 meropenem Css were included. eGFRCKDEPI overestimated mCLCR up to 90 mL/min, then mCLCR was underestimated. eGFRCG and eGFRMDRD overestimated mCLCR across the entire range of GFR. In critically ill patients, dose adjustments of 24 h-CI meropenem should be based on mCLCR. Equations for estimation of GFR may lead to gross under/overestimates of meropenem dosages. TDM may be highly beneficial, especially for critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance.