Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.
SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.
Antecedentes: El hipoparatiroidismo posoperatorio constituye la complicación más frecuente de la tiroidectomía total. Se asocia, entre otras cosas, a internación prolongada y múltiples pruebas de laboratorio, y con ello a un incremento en los costos de salud. La identificación de pacientes con mayor riesgo de padecer esta complicación permite realizar un tratamiento precoz, disminuyendo el costo económico y evitando complicaciones asociadas a un retraso en la externación. Se han descrito diversos predictores para identificar tempranamente a los pacientes en riesgo; en los últimos años, ha tomado particular relevancia el uso de la parathormona (PTH). Objetivo: El objetivo del presente trabajo es revisar la literatura existente sobre la utilidad de la PTH como predictor de hipocalcemia postiroidectomía. Método: Se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed revisando la evidencia existente sobre eficacia de la PTH como predictor de hipocalcemia posoperatoria, su repercusión económica, el tiempo óptimo para la toma de muestra y el modo de implementación. Conclusión: El uso de la PTH permite predecir con adecuada sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo negativo y valor predictivo positivo los pacientes en riesgo de padecer hipocalcemia posoperatoria. Sin embargo, los valores de corte, los tiempos de toma de muestra y la cantidad de estas varían entre los autores, por lo que persisten algunos interrogantes acerca de la estandarización de su uso.
El carcinoma escamoso de lengua es la lesión maligna más frecuente de la cavidad oral. El hallazgo de metástasis en este tipo de neoplasias se considera el principal factor de mal pronóstico con efecto marcado en la sobrevida global del paciente. La progresión habitual suele ser locorregional, en el lecho quirúrgico o a nivel ganglionar, siendo poco frecuente el hallazgo de afectación sistémica. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 40 años de edad con diagnóstico de cáncer de lengua y metástasis renales bilaterales, a los 11 meses del diagnóstico inicial. La biología agresiva, la localización extremadamente rara de las metástasis y el pronóstico sombrío ilustran un caso inusual que resalta la importancia de su publicación.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.