Endometriosis is a debilitating condition characterized by high recurrence rates. The etiology and pathogenesis remain unclear. Typically, endometriosis causes pain and infertility, although 20-25% of patients are asymptomatic. The principal aims of therapy include relief of symptoms, resolution of existing endometriotic implants, and prevention of new foci of ectopic endometrial tissue. Current therapeutic approaches are far from being curative; they focus on managing the clinical symptoms of the disease rather than fighting the disease. Specific combinations of medical, surgical, and psychological treatments can ameliorate the quality of life of women with endometriosis. The benefits of these treatments have not been entirely demonstrated, particularly in terms of expectations that women hold for their own lives. Although theoretically advantageous, there is no evidence that a combination medical-surgical treatment significantly enhances fertility, and it may unnecessarily delay further fertility therapy. Randomized controlled trials are required to demonstrate the efficacy of different treatments.

The purpose of this study was to compare, in infertile patients, the efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy, in restoring fertility and to evaluate the obstetric outcomes. Between January 1993 and January 1998, 131 patients of reproductive age, with anamnesis of infertility, underwent myomectomy because of the presence of at least one large myoma (diameter greater than or = 5 cm). Patients were randomly selected for treatment by laparotomy (n = 65) or laparoscopy (n = 66). The two groups were homogeneous for number, size and position of large myomata. Significant differences were found in the post-operative outcome: febrile morbidity (> 38 degrees C) was more frequent in the abdominal than in the laparoscopic group (26.2 versus 12.1%; P < 0.05). Laparotomy caused a more pronounced haemoglobin drop (2.17 +/- 1.57 versus 1.33 +/- 1.23; P < 0.001); three patients received a blood transfusion after laparotomy and none after laparoscopy. The post-operative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (142.80 +/- 34.60 versus 75.61 +/- 37.09 h; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the two groups as concerns pregnancy rate (55.9% after laparotomy, 53.6% after laparoscopy), abortion rate (12.1 versus 20%), preterm delivery (7.4 versus 5%) and the use of Caesarean section (77.8 versus 65%). No case of uterine rupture during pregnancy or labour was observed.

The non-pregnant uterus shows different patterns of contractility during the menstrual cycle. A renewed interest in uterine contractility has resulted from reports of non-invasive ultrasound (US) based studies. To clarify the changes in uterine contractility occurring throughout the menstrual cycle, we prospectively studied uterine contractions (UC) at six representative stages with US and intrauterine pressure (IUP) based approaches in 30 cycling volunteers. Results showed UC frequency could be measured by either US or IUP. UC amplitude and resting pressure tone could only be assessed by IUP. Conversely, direction of UC displacement could only be assessed by US. UC frequency increased at mid-cycle and decreased throughout the luteal phase suggesting oestradiol and progesterone exert positive and negative actions on uterine contractility, respectively. UC amplitude increased throughout the menstrual cycle to maximum values in the late luteal phase. Retrograde UC were most frequent at mid-cycle and convergent ('opposing') UC predominated during the luteal phase. While the former pattern ensures sperm transport, the latter may facilitate embryo implantation. In conclusion, UC changes throughout the menstrual cycle assessed by US and IUP emphasize the hormonal dependence of uterine contractility. Although UC patterns favouring sperm transport appear regulated by oestradiol, uterine quiescence and the dominance of convergent UC prevailing at the time of implantation are linked to progesterone. These data will serve to identify and treat possible dyskinetic changes in uterine contractility, particularly in women suffering from infertility, endometriosis, and dysmenorrhea.

No abstract