Cancers evolve by a reiterative process of clonal expansion, genetic diversification and clonal selection within the adaptive landscapes of tissue ecosystems. The dynamics are complex with highly variable patterns of genetic diversity and resultant clonal architecture. Therapeutic intervention may decimate cancer clones, and erode their habitats, but inadvertently provides potent selective pressure for the expansion of resistant variants. The inherently Darwinian character of cancer lies at the heart of therapeutic failure but perhaps also holds the key to more effective control.

Neoplasms are microcosms of evolution. Within a neoplasm, a mosaic of mutant cells compete for space and resources, evade predation by the immune system and can even cooperate to disperse and colonize new organs. The evolution of neoplastic cells explains both why we get cancer and why it has been so difficult to cure. The tools of evolutionary biology and ecology are providing new insights into neoplastic progression and the clinical control of cancer.

Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) drives neoplastic progression and therapeutic resistance. We used EXPANDS and PyClone to detect clones >10% frequency within 1,165 exome sequences from TCGA tumors. 86% of tumors across 12 cancer types had at least two clones. ITH in nuclei morphology was associated with genetic ITH (Spearman ρ: 0.24–0.41, P<0.001). Mutation of a driver gene that typically appears in smaller clones was a survival risk factor (HR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.71–2.69). The risk of mortality also increased when >2 clones coexisted (HR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.20–1.87). In two independent datasets, copy number alterations affecting either <25% or >75% of a tumor’s genome predicted reduced risk (HR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.08–0.29). Mortality risk also declined when more than four clones coexisted in the sample, suggesting a tradeoff between costs and benefits of genomic instability. ITH and genomic instability have the potential to be useful measures universally applicable across cancers.