Implantation of covered SEMS in patients with esophageal leak or perforation is a safe and feasible alternative to operative treatment and can lower the interventional morbidity rate.

The transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is an adequate method for the local full-thickness excision of large rectum polyps and pT1 "low-risk" rectal carcinomas. We studied prospectively the relevance of this surgical technique concerning complete tumour excision after R1/R2-polypectomy of malignant rectal polyps. 16 patients with pT1 "low-risk" rectal carcinoma and macroscopic (R2) or microscopic (R1) incomplete endoscopic polypectomy were locally resected by TEM. In 12 patients (75 %) no residual tumour was found. In the remaining four cases (25 %), one adenoma with high-grade atypia, two pT1 "low-risk" carcinomas and one tumour infiltration in the mesorectal fat were diagnosed. The patient with the mesorectal infiltration was immediately operated on with radical resection. No further tumour cells were found in this specimen. The median follow-up was 21 months. One patient with a pT1 "low-risk" carcinoma developed a local recurrence and a single hepatic metastasis in the left liver lobe after TEM. Both were completely resected. Currently, all patients are living without evidence of tumour recurrence. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a suitable method for the treatment of pT1 "low-risk" rectal carcinomas after incomplete endoscopic polypectomy. In cases of a "high-risk" tumour or deeper tumour infiltration (pT> 1) after TEM radical resection must be carried out.

Preoperative colonoscopy prior to esophagectomy and intended gastric tube formation appears unnecessary from the surgical point of view, as intraoperative conversion to a colon interposition is rare. The rate of colon adenomas or carcinomas was not increased in patients with adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus than in an age-matched, normal population.

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placed in the pull through (PT) technique is a common procedure to restore enteral feeding in patients with swallowing disorders. Limitations of this technique are patients with obstruction of the pharynx or esophagus or with an esophageal stent. We report our experience with the direct puncture (DP) PEG device. Methods: We included 154 patients (55 women). One hundred forty patients had cancer. After passing the endoscope into the stomach, 4 gastropexies were performed with a gastropexy device and the PEG was placed with the introducer method. After 1 month, the sutures were removed and a constant gastrocutaneous fistula had been created and the new catheter could be placed safely. Results: The DP PEG was successfully placed in all patients. Overall complication rate was 11% (minor: 6%, major: 5%). The most common event was tube dislocation (40 cases). In 5 cases of dislocation, this resulted in a major complication with injuring the gastric wall and the necessity for surgical treatment. Conclusions: The DP PEG system is safe, and can be used in cases in which a standard PT PEG is not feasible. To avoid dislocation, strict adherence to a post-interventional protocol is highly recommended.