Purpose: To carry out a study of association between socioeconomic and demographic factors and homicides in general population, in the state of Bahia, in 2009. Methods: This is an ecological study. The data were collected from the database of the Information System about Mortality of the Ministry of Health, from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics and the Institute of Applied Economic Research. The Global Moran index was calculated for the detection of spatial autocorrelation, and the Local Moran index was calculated for the detection of spatial Clusters. The transformation in the variable answer (homicides rates) was performed and it was shaped using the Conditional Autoregressive Model. Results: The data showed spatial autocorrelation. Two clusters of municipalities with high rates of homicides were identified, one located predominantly in the Greater Metropolitan Region of Salvador and the other in the South Region of Bahia, especially Eunápolis and Lauro de Freitas, which had the highest rates. The Average Residents Variables, local GDP and the Percentage of Illiteracy presented an inverse association with homicide rates, and the variables Firjan's municipal development index of work and income. Enrolment in high school and the Average of Bolsa Família were directly associated. Conclusions: The urbanization process, in most cases, not controlled by the State, in most cases, made the cities bigger and with better socioeconomic conditions, attraction centers for people with different socioeconomic levels, increasing the social inequality among the residents of these regions, with parallel increase in homicide rates.
This research explored the integrated effect that several mobility scenarios had on traffic performance, conflicts, global and local pollutants, and emission-related costs on a University Campus. An emphasis was given to the campus parking areas. One of the main contributions of this study was the identification of hotspot in terms of emissions, costs and traffic conflict locations. A well-calibrated and validated modeling platform of traffic, emissions and safety was used to examine different traffic scenarios in the University of Aveiro, Portugal. These included the replacement of traffic lights by roundabouts, direct access to campus and some parking areas, increasing campus walkability and introduction of speed humps on main crosswalks. The analysis was performed both link-by-link and in the overall study area. Mobility scenarios with a new direct access to the campus yielded average reductions up to 9% in both costs and local pollutants (carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons), and 36% and 32% for the number of stops and traffic conflicts, respectively. Nonetheless, additional traffic conflicts can be expected within campus after the implementation of those scenarios compared to the existing situation.
Context.-Almost all cervical cancers are related to the human papillomavirus (HPV). Future strategies for cervical cancer screening will be based on HPV detection. The Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test is currently the most widely used method to screen for HPV.Objective.-To test the performance of the Cervista HPV HR test for cervical screening.Design.-We examined 875 cervical samples by HC2 and Cervista. Of these, 64 were high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2þ) cases and were used to test the sensitivity of the assay. The remaining 811 were non-CIN 2þ cases, which were used to compare specificity. The noninferiority score test was used, with at least 0.90 for sensitivity and 0.98 for specificity and with a j value of 0.7.Results.-Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 100% and 86.4% for the HC2 test, and 98.4% and 85.2% for the Cervista test. The agreement between the two assays was 91.7% (802 of 875; j ¼ 0.743; 95% confidence interval, 0.688-0.798). The noninferiority score test (relative sensitivity of 90%, T ¼ 2.85, P ¼ .002; and relative specificity of 98%, T ¼ 2.75, P ¼ .003) demonstrated that the Cervista results were not inferior to those of the HC2 test. Intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibility was determined by evaluating 513 and 507 samples, respectively. These reproducibilities showed j values of 0.886 (95% confidence interval, 0.845-0.927) and 0.907 (95% confidence interval, 0.886-0.948), respectively.Conclusions.-Our results demonstrate that the Cervista HPV HR test shows the same specificity as the HC2 assay. We therefore conclude that the Cervista HPV HR test is suitable for cervical cancer screening purposes. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:241-244; doi: 10.5858/ arpa.2014-0012-OA) N early all cervical cancers are related to the human papillomavirus (HPV). Persistent cervical infection with certain types of HPV is a prerequisite for the development of cervical cancer through precursor lesion, namely, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3.1,2 The most important carcinogenic HPV genotypes are HPV16 and HPV18. The detection of high-risk HPV (HR HPV) in cervical samples, together with abnormal cytologic findings, is crucial in cervical cancer screening.3 It is essential to improve screening strategies to avoid unnecessary clinical follow-up, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of healthy women. 4 In Catalonia, the HPV test has been used in the cervical cancer screening protocol since 2006 as a complementary test to cytology in 3 circumstances: atypia on squamous cells of undetermined significance, monitoring after treatment for high-grade CIN (CIN 2þ), and screening of women older than 40 years who have not had a cytologic test in the previous 5 years.Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) is currently the most widely used HPV method to determine the presence of HR HPV in cytologic samples. It shows greater clinical sensitivity than other methods and acceptable specificity. 5,6 A group of experts in 2009 published recommendations for the validation of n...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.