The syntheses are reported for two novel Tb(3+) heterotrimetallic cyanometallates, K(2)[Tb(H(2)O)(4)(Pt(CN)(4))(2)]Au(CN)(2)·2H(2)O (1) and [Tb(C(10)N(2)H(8))(H(2)O)(4)(Pt(CN)(4))(Au(CN)(2))]·1.5C(10)N(2)H(8)·2H(2)O (2) (C(10)N(2)H(8) = 2,2'-bipyridine). Both compounds have been isolated as colorless crystals, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction has been used to investigate their structural features. Crystallographic data (MoKα, λ = 0.71073 Å, T = 290 K): 1, tetragonal, space group P4(2)/nnm, a = 11.9706(2) Å, c = 17.8224(3) Å, V = 2553.85(7) Å(3), Z = 4; 2, triclinic, space group P1, a = 10.0646(2) Å, b = 10.7649(2) Å, c = 17.6655(3) Å, α = 101.410(2)°, β = 92.067(2)°, γ = 91.196(2)°, V = 1874.14(6) Å(3), Z = 2. For the case of 1, the structure contains Au(2)Pt(4) hexameric noble metal clusters, while 2 includes Au(2)Pt(2) tetrameric clusters. The clusters are alike in that they contain Au-Au and Au-Pt, but not Pt-Pt, metallophilic interactions. Also, the discrete clusters are directly coordinated to Tb(3+) and sensitize its emission in both solid-state compounds, 1 and 2. The Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of 1 show broad excitation bands corresponding to donor groups when monitored at the Tb(3+) ion f-f transitions, which is typical of donor/acceptor energy transfer (ET) behavior in the system. The compound also displays a broad emission band at ∼445 nm, assignable to a donor metal centered (MC) emission of the Au(2)Pt(4) clusters. The PL properties of 2 show a similar Tb(3+) emission in the visible region and a lack of donor-based emission at room temperature; however, at 77 K a weak, broad emission occurs at 400 nm, indicative of uncoordinated 2,2'-bipyridine, along with strong Tb(3+) transitions. The absolute quantum yield (QY) for the Tb(3+) emission ((5)D(4) → (7)F(J (J = 6-3))) in 1 is 16.3% with a lifetime of 616 μs when excited at 325 nm. In contrast the weak MC emission at 445 nm has a quantum yield of 0.9% with a significantly shorter lifetime of 0.61 μs. For 2 the QY value decreases to 9.3% with a slightly shorter lifetime of 562 μs. The reduced QY in 2 is considered to be a consequence of (1) the slightly increased donor-acceptor excited energy gap relative to the optimal gap suggested for Tb(3+) and (2) Tb(3+) emission quenching via a bpy ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) excited state.

A series of novel terbium tetracyanoplatinate compounds all incorporating tridentate 2,2':6'2″-terpyridine (terpy) or 4'-chloro-2,2':6'2″-terpyridine (terpy-Cl) were synthesized and used to investigate the phenomenon of dual-donor sensitization of Tb(3+). Judicious choice of the Tb(3+) salt and reaction conditions results in the isolation of {Tb(terpy)(H2O)2(NO3)Pt(CN)4}·CH3CN (1A), {Tb(terpy)(H2O)2(NO3)Pt(CN)4}·3.5H2O (1B), {Tb(terpy-Cl)(H2O)2(NO3)Pt(CN)4}·2.5H2O (2), [Tb(terpy)(H2O)2(CH3COO)2]2Pt(CN)4·4H2O (3), or [Tb2(terpy)2(H2O)2(CH3COO)5]2Pt(CN)4·7H2O (4). The compounds 1A, 1B, and 2 contain one-dimensional polymeric structures with bridging of [Tb(L)(NO3)(H2O)2](2+) (L = terpy or terpy-Cl) moieties by cis-bridging tetracyanoplatinate (TCP) anions as determined via single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Both 3 and 4, however, contain Tb(3+) coordinated by multiple acetate ligands and terpy, but not TCP, and are classified as zero-dimensional complex salts. Platinophilic interactions that dominate tetracyanoplatinate structural chemistry are present in the form of dimeric units in the polymeric compounds, but are totally absent in 3 and 4. The structural differences result in markedly different luminescence properties for the two classes of compounds. All of the polymeric compounds display efficient donor-acceptor intramolecular energy transfer (IET) from the terpy unit to the Tb(3+) ion. Although the TCP units are also directly coordinated to the Tb(3+) ion in the three polymers, only in 1B and 2 are the Pt···Pt interactions strong enough to provide MMLCT bands of appropriate energy to result in a dual-donor effect to the Tb(3+) sensitization. Even in these cases, TCP does not efficiently sensitize the Tb(3+), rather a broad band TCP emission results. However, terpy and acetate ligands are bonded directly to the Tb(3+) ion in 3 and 4 and provide a strong dual-donor sensitization effect as evidenced by the large QY for Tb(3+).

The synthesis of three different europium tetracyanoplatinates all incorporating 2,2':6',2''-terpyridine (terpy) have been carried out in acetonitrile/water mixtures by reaction of Eu(3+) salts with terpy and potassium tetracyanoplatinate. The use of different Eu(3+) sources results in the isolation of Eu(C(15)H(11)N(3))(H(2)O)(2)(NO(3))(Pt(CN)(4)) x CH(3)CN (1), {Eu(C(15)H(11)N(3))(H(2)O)(3)}(2)(Pt(CN)(4))(3) x 2 H(2)O (2), or [Eu(C(15)H(11)N(3))(H(2)O)(2)(CH(3)COO)(2)](2)Pt(CN)(4) x 3 H(2)O (3) for the nitrate, triflate, or acetate salts, respectively. All three compounds have been prepared as colorless crystals, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction has been used to investigate their structural features. Crystallographic data (MoK alpha, lambda = 0.71073 A, T = 290 K): 1, monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c, a = 12.835(1), b = 15.239(1), c = 13.751(2) A, beta = 105.594(9) degrees, V = 2590.8(5) A(3), Z = 4; 2, triclinic, space group P1, a = 9.1802(8) A, b = 10.8008(9) A, c = 13.5437(9) A, alpha = 84.491(6) degrees, beta = 75.063(7) degrees, gamma = 79.055(7) degrees, V = 1272.4(2) A(3), Z = 1; 3, triclinic, space group P1, a = 12.110(3) A, b = 12.7273(11) A, c = 18.7054(16) A, alpha = 92.859(7) degrees, beta = 92.200(11) degrees, gamma = 118.057(10) degrees, V = 2534.8(7) A(3), Z = 2. Variation of the counteranions in these systems provides the opportunity to modify the structures and coordination environment of Eu(3+) for 1-3. Compounds 1 and 2 are both one-dimensional, polymeric compounds that contain Eu(3+) ions chelated by terpy and bridged by tetracyanoplatinate anions. 3 is a zero-dimensional complex salt in which Eu(3+) is coordinated by terpy, acetate, and water, but not tetracyanoplatinate. The structural differences result in varying sensitization phenomena for the three compounds. Compounds 1 and 2 display efficient donor-acceptor intramolecular energy transfer (IET) where dual donor species, terpyridine and tetracyanoplatinate, simultaneously enhance the acceptor Eu(3+) emission. In both compounds the donor species are directly coordinated to the acceptor ion, and hence a highly efficient dual-donor effect is exhibited for the IET mechanisms. In 3 where only the terpy ligand is directly coordinated to Eu(3+), the sensitization involves only one donor species. The Pt(CN)(4)(2-) unit in 3, which lacks direct bonding to Eu(3+), exhibits strong emission indicating the lack of cooperative enhancement of the lanthanide emission.

The highly luminescent bimetallic cyanide materials, Gd(terpy)(H(2)O)(NO(3))(2)M(CN)(2) (M = Au, Ag; GdAu and GdAg, respectively) are quick and easy to synthesize under ambient conditions. A characteristic feature exhibited by both solid-state compounds is an intense red emission when excited with UV light. Additionally, GdAu exhibits a broad-band green emission upon excitation in the near UV region. A combination of structural and spectroscopic results for the compounds helps explain the underlying conditions responsible for their unique properties. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments expose their structural features, including the fact that they are isostructural. Crystallographic data for the representative GdAu compound (Mo K(α), λ = 0.71073 Å, T = 290 K): triclinic, space group P ̅1, a = 7.5707(3) Å, b = 10.0671(4) Å, c = 15.1260(4) Å, α = 74.923(3)°, β = 78.151(3)°, γ = 88.401(3)°, V = 1089.04(7) Å(3), and Z = 2. Although the compounds crystallize as dimers containing M···M distances smaller than the sum of their van der Waals radii, the Au···Au (3.5054(4) Å) and/or the Ag···Ag (3.6553(5) Å) interactions are relatively weak and are not responsible for the low energy red emission. Rather, the green emission in GdAu presumably originates from the [Au(CN)(2)(-)](2) dimeric excimer, while the [Ag(CN)(2)(-)](2) dimers in GdAg do not display visible emission at either 290 or 77 K. The unusual red emission exhibited by both compounds likely originates from the formation of an excited state exciplex that involves intermolecular π-stacking of 2,2':6',2"-terpyridine ligands. The room-temperature and low-temperature steady-state photoluminescent properties, along with detailed time-dependent, lifetime, and quantum yield spectroscopic data provide evidence regarding the sources of the multiple visible emissions exhibited by these complexes.

No abstract