The etiological treatment of Chagas disease remains neglected. The compounds available show several limitations, mainly during the chronic phase. Lychnopholide encapsulated in polymeric nanocapsules (LYC-NC) was efficacious in mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi and treated by intravenous administration during the acute phase (AP). As the oral route is preferred for treatment of chronic infections, such as Chagas disease, this study evaluated the use of oral LYC-NC in the AP and also compared it with LYC-NC administered to mice by the oral and intravenous routes during the chronic phase (CP). The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by fresh blood examination, hemoculture, PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The cure rates in the AP and CP were 62.5% and 55.6%, respectively, upon oral administration of LYC-poly(D,L-lactide)-polyethylene glycol nanocapsules (LYC-PLA-PEG-NC) and 57.0% and 30.0%, respectively, with LYC-poly--caprolactone nanocapsules (LYC-PCL-NC). These cure rates were significantly higher than that of free LYC, which did not cure any animals. LYC-NC formulations administered orally during the AP showed cure rates similar to that of benznidazole, but only LYC-NC cured mice in the CP. Similar results were achieved with intravenous treatment during the CP. The higher cure rates obtained with LYC loaded in PLA-PEG-NC may be due to the smaller particle size of these NC and the presence of PEG, which influence tissue diffusion and the controlled release of LYC. Furthermore, PLA-PEG-NC may improve the stability of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract. This work is the first report of cure of experimental Chagas disease via oral administration during the CP. These findings represent a new and important perspective for oral treatment of Chagas disease.
Chagas disease remains neglected, and current chemotherapeutics present severe limitations. Lychnopholide (LYC) at low doses loaded in polymeric poly(d,l-lactide)-block-polyethylene glycol (PLA-PEG) nanocapsules (LYC-PLA-PEG-NC) exhibits anti-Trypanosoma cruzi efficacy in mice infected with a partially drug-resistant strain. This study reports the efficacy of LYC-PLA-PEG-NC at higher doses in mice infected with a T. cruzi strain resistant to benznidazole (BZ) and nifurtimox (NF) treated at both the acute phase (AP) and the chronic phase (CP) of infection by the oral route. Mice infected with the T. cruzi VL-10 strain were treated by the oral route with free LYC (12 mg/kg of body weight/day), LYC-PLA-PEG-NC (8 or 12 mg/kg/day), or BZ at 100 mg/kg/day or were not treated (controls). Treatment efficacy was assessed by hemoculture (HC), PCR, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), heart tissue quantitative PCR (qPCR), and histopathology. According to classical cure criteria, treatment with LYC-PLA-PEG-NC at 12 mg/kg/day cured 75% (AP) and 88% (CP) of the animals, while at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day, 43% (AP) and 43% (CP) were cured, showing dose-dependent efficacy. The negative qPCR results for heart tissue and the absence of inflammation/fibrosis agreed with the negative results obtained by HC and PCR. Thus, the mice treated with the highest dose could be considered 100% cured, in spite of a low ELISA reactivity in some animals. No cure was observed in animals treated with free LYC or BZ or the controls. These results are exceptional in terms of experimental Chagas disease chemotherapy and provide evidence of the outstanding contribution of nanotechnology in mice infected with a T. cruzi strain totally resistant to BZ and NF at both phases of infection. Therefore, LYC-PLA-PEG-NC has great potential as a new treatment for Chagas disease and deserves further investigations in clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.