Purpose Long delays in waiting lists have a negative impact on the principles of equity and providing timely access to care. This study aimed to assess waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia repair (incisional ventral vs. inguinal hernia) to define explicit prioritization criteria. Methods A cross-sectional single-center study was designed. Patients in the waiting list for incisional/ventral hernia ( n = 42) and inguinal hernia ( n = 50) repair were interviewed by phone and completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires (EQ-5D, COMI-hernia, HerQLes) as a measure of severity. Priority was measured as hernia complexity, patient frailty using the modified frailty index (mFI-11), and the consumption of analgesics for hernia. Results The mean (SD) time on the waiting list was 5.5 (3.2) months (range 1–14). Complex hernia was present in 34.8% of the patients. HRQoL was moderately poor in patients with incisional/ventral hernia (mean HerQL score 66.1), whereas it was moderately good in patients with inguinal hernia (mean COMI-hernia score 3.40). The use of analgesics was higher in patients with incisional/ventral hernia as compared with those with inguinal hernia (1.48 [0.54] vs. 1.31 [0.51], P = 0.021). Worst values of mFI were associated with inguinal hernia as compared with incisional/ventral hernia (0.21 [0.14] vs. 0.12 [0.11]; P = 0.010). Conclusion Explicit criteria for prioritization in the waiting lists may be the consumption of analgesics for patients with incisional/ventral hernia and frailty for patients with inguinal hernia. A reasonable approach seems to establish separate waiting lists for incisional/ventral hernia and inguinal hernia repair.

No abstract

Background. Acute esophageal necrosis is a rare and potentially lethal entity. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, generally presenting with symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We present a case that presents atypically with initial esophageal perforation. Case presentation. A 46-year-old man with a history of alcoholism and cocaine use, an active smoker, and a ruptured celiac trunk aneurysm treated by embolization, who, after acute chest and epigastric pain, is diagnosed with a Stanford B thoracoabdominal aortic dissection, being repaired endovascularly by placing an aortic endoprosthesis. Due to clinical suspicion of mesenteric ischemia complicated with esophageal/gastric perforation, a postoperative tomography was performed, revealing perforation of the esophagus distal to the left pleura and ischemic cholecystitis. Transhiatal esophagectomy, cervical esophagostomy, Witzel-type decompressive gastrostomy, Witzel-type feeding jejunostomy, classic cholecystectomy, and mediastinum drainage were performed. During the postoperative period, the patient remained in critical condition, dying as a result of hypoxic encephalopathy. The histopathological study reported acute transmural esophageal ischemia. Discussion. Tissue hypoperfusion plays a dominant role in the pathogenesis of acute esophageal necrosis. Esophageal perforation is a serious complication and can occur in the early stages, with esophagectomy and deferred digestive reconstruction being the appropriate treatment. Conclusion. Ischemia is a fundamental mechanism of acute esophageal necrosis; its diagnosis must always be established in the various complications that may occur in patients with hemodynamic compromise, in order to obtain a timely treatment.

In the original online version of this article Oreste Claudio Buonomo's family name was misspelled.The original article was corrected.

No abstract