No abstract

No abstract

Two techniques are described to treat distal radius fractures: conventional (Henry approach) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. The latter technique has been described by different authors such as Imatani et al. and Zenke et al. This was a descriptive retrospective study, analyzing 26 adult patients with unstable distal radius fracture, extra-articular type A or partially intra-articular type B according to AO. The approaches used were: (i) single longitudinal palmar incision; (ii) double T-incision (horizontal and vertical) and (iii) double position II. Ages were between 21 and 78 years. Most affected hand was the right. Most common fracture was 23B2 (AO classification). In total, 84.6% of the patients did not present complications. According to the functional evaluation of the wrist by the Mayo Clinic, 31% showed excellent results, 42% showed good results, 27% showed fair results. The techniques had satisfactory results for the osteosynthesis with more aesthetic and less invasive approach.

No abstract

BackgroundIntravascular air embolism (AE) is a preventable but potentially catastrophic complication caused by intravenous tubing, trauma, and diagnostic and surgical procedures. The potentially fatal risks of arterial AE are well-known, and emerging evidence demonstrates impact of venous AEs on inflammatory response and coagulation factors. A novel FDA-approved in-line air detection and purging system was used to detect and remove air caused by administering a rapid fluid bolus during surgery.MethodsA prospective, randomized, case series was conducted. Subjects were observed using standard monitors, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room. After general anesthesia was induced, an introducer and pulmonary artery catheter was inserted in the right internal jugular to administer fluids and monitor cardiac pressures. Six patients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied. Each patient received four randomized fluid boluses: two with the in-line air purging device, two without. For each bolus, a bulb infuser was squeezed three times (10–15 mL) over 5 s. The TEE was positioned in the mid-esophageal right atrium (RA) to quantify peak air clearance, and images were video recorded throughout each bolus. Air was quantified using optical densitometry (OD) from images demonstrating maximal air in the RA.ResultsAll subjects demonstrated significantly lower air burden when the air reduction device was used (p = 0.004), and the average time to clear 90% of air was also lower, 3.7 ± 1.2 s vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 s (p < 0.001).ConclusionAn air purging system reduced air burden from bolus administration and could consequently reduce the risk of harmful or fatal AEs during surgery.