The use of U.S.-oriented racial categories in the 2000 decennial
census conducted by the Census Bureau in Puerto Rico provided results that
may not accurately reflect social dynamics in Puerto Rico, more generally,
and inequality based on race, in particular. This work explores how
variations in racial typologies used for the collection of data in Puerto
Rico and the methodology used to collect such data produce widely ranging
results on racial identification that in turn affect the measurement of
the impact of “race” on social outcomes. Specifically, the
analysis focuses on how the omission of locally based and meaningful
racial terminology from census questionnaires leads to results on racial
identification that differ markedly from those found in survey data that
include such terminology. In addition, differing strategies to record the
racial identification of Puerto Ricans on the island (i.e.,
self-identification versus identification by others), lead to variations
that highlight the changing effect of race on socioeconomic status. Who
identifies a person's race affects analyses of how race affects the
life chances of individuals in Puerto Rico.
How to citeComplete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative caribbEans in nEw York...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.