Pulmonary fibrosis involves various types of immune cells and soluble mediators, including TGF‐β and IL‐35, a recently identified heterodimeric cytokine that belongs to the IL‐12 cytokine family. However, the effect of regulatory IL‐35 may play an important role in fibrotic diseases. The aim of this paper is to explore the immunoregulatory role of IL‐35 in the development of fibrosis in interstitial lung disease (ILD). To gain a better understanding of this issue, the concentrations of IL‐35 and different profibrotic cytokines in fibrotic (F‐ILD) and non‐fibrotic (NF‐ILD) patients by ELISA were compared to that of intracellular IL‐35 and IL‐17 on CD4+ T cells stimulated in the presence of BAL or with different ratios of recombinant IL‐35 (rIL‐35) and TGF‐β (rTGF‐β), which were evaluated by flow cytometry. We observed that BAL concentration of IL‐35 was lower in F patients (p < 0.001) and was negatively correlated with concentrations of TGF‐β (p < 0.001) and IL‐17 (p < 0.001). In supplemented cell cultures, BAL from NF but not F patients enhanced the percentage of IL‐35 + CD4+ T (p < 0.001) cells and decreased the percentage of IL‐17 + CD4+ T cells (p < 0.001). The percentage of IL‐35 + CD4+ T cells correlated positively with BAL concentration of IL‐35 (p = 0.02), but correlated negatively with BAL concentrations of IL‐17 (p = 0.007) and TGF‐β (p = 0.01). After adjusting the concentrations of recombinant cytokines to establish a TGF‐β: IL‐35 ratio of 1:4, an enhanced percentage of IL‐35 + CD4+ T cells (p < 0.001) but a decreased percentage of IL‐17 + CD4+ T cells (p < 0.001) was observed. After adding recombinant IL‐35 to the BAL from F patients until a 1:4 ratio of TGF‐β: IL‐35 was reached, a significantly increased percentage of IL‐35 + CD4+ T cells (p < 0.001) and a decreased percentage of IL‐17 + CD4+ T cells (p = 0.003) was found. These results suggest that IL‐35 may induce an anti‐fibrotic response, regulating the effect of TGF‐β and the inflammatory response on CD4+ T cells. In addition, the TGF‐β: IL‐35 ratio in BAL has been shown to be a potential biomarker to predict the outcome of F patients with ILD.
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are unpredictable autoimmune-like toxicities induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). irAEs are a consequence of a breakdown in self-tolerance. ICIs can induce autoantibody formation, and the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) has been reported in patients who developed irAEs. Our goal was to compare ANA patterns by indirect immunofluorescence at different timepoints before (baseline) and after the initiation of ICI treatment and to analyze the role of ANA pattern changes as predictors of irAEs. This is a 2-year-follow-up prospective study of 152 consecutive patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents. They were included from September 2018 until March 2020 in the Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain). We grouped patients into three groups: ANA de novo (patients who showed new ANA patterns at any time after ICI initiation), ANA (ANA positive at baseline without changes in the ANA patterns after initiation of treatment) and non-ANA (ANA negative at baseline and after ICI initiation). We did not find any association between the appearance of ANAs and irAE rates or the number and types of irAEs. However, patients in the ANA de novo group showed higher severe irAE rates (grade ≥ 3) than the other groups. Additionally, in most of the patients with severe irAEs (83.3%), changes in ANA patterns preceded irAE onset. In conclusion, we found ANA induction during ICI therapies in 22 patients and our results suggest that the appearance of ANAs may predict the severity of the irAE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.