Asian ancestry. Despite this, individuals of African ancestry remain understudied in genomic research for blinding disorders. OBJECTIVES To perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of African ancestry populations and evaluate potential mechanisms of pathogenesis for loci associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS A 2-stage GWAS with a discovery data set of 2320 individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma and 2121 control individuals without primary open-angle glaucoma. The validation stage included an additional 6937 affected individuals and 14 917 unaffected individuals using multicenter clinic-and population-based participant recruitment approaches. Study participants were recruited from

IMPORTANCEMutations in the myocilin (MYOC) gene are the most common molecularly defined cause of primary open-angle glaucoma that typically occurs in patients with high intraocular pressures (IOP). One MYOC mutation, p.Gln368Ter, has been associated with as many as 1.6% of primary open-angle glaucoma cases that had a mean maximum recorded IOP of 30 mm Hg. However, to our knowledge, the role of the p.Gln368Ter mutation in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) with an IOP of 21 mm Hg or lower has not been investigated. OBJECTIVETo evaluate the role of the p.Gln368Ter MYOC mutation in patients with NTG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this case-control study of the prevalence of the p.Gln368Ter mutation in patients with NTG, cohort 1 was composed of 772 patients with NTG and 2152 controls from the United States (Iowa, Minnesota, and New York) and England and cohort 2 was composed of 561 patients with NTG and 2606 controls from the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and the NEIGHBORHOOD consortium. Genotyping was conducted using real-time polymerase chain reaction that was confirmed with Sanger sequencing, the imputation of genome-wide association study data, or an analysis of whole-exome sequence data. Data analysis occurred between April 2007 and April 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESComparison of the frequency of the p.Gln368Ter MYOC mutation between NTG cases and controls with the Fisher exact test. RESULTSOf 6091 total participants, 3346 (54.9%) were women and 5799 (95.2%) were white. We detected the p.Gln368Ter mutation in 7 of 772 patients with NTG (0.91%) and 7 of 2152 controls (0.33%) in cohort 1 (P = .03). In cohort 2, we detected the p.Gln368Ter mutation in 4 of 561 patients with NTG (0.71%) and 10 of 2606 controls (0.38%; P = .15). When the cohorts were analyzed as a group, the p.Gln368Ter mutation was associated with NTG (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.98-5.3; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn cohorts 1 and 2, the p.Gln368Ter mutation in MYOC was found in patients with IOPs that were 21 mm Hg or lower (NTG), although at a frequency that is lower than previously detected in patients with higher IOP. These data suggest that the p.Gln368Ter mutation may be associated with glaucoma in patients with normal IOPs as well as in patients with IOPs that are greater than 21 mm Hg.

Background Glaucoma is a leading cause of visual disability and blindness. Release of iris pigment within the eye, pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS), can lead to one type of glaucoma known as pigmentary glaucoma. PDS has a genetic component, however, the genes involved with this condition are largely unknown. We sought to discover genes that cause PDS by testing cohorts of patients and controls for mutations using a tiered analysis of exome data. Results Our primary analysis evaluated melanosome-related genes that cause dispersion of iris pigment in mice (TYRP1, GPNMB, LYST, DCT, and MITF). We identified rare mutations, but they were not statistically enriched in PDS patients. Our secondary analyses examined PMEL (previously linked with PDS), MRAP, and 19 other genes. Four MRAP mutations were identified in PDS cases but not in controls (p = 0.016). Immunohistochemical analysis of human donor eyes revealed abundant MRAP protein in the iris, the source of pigment in PDS. However, analysis of MRAP in additional cohorts (415 cases and 1645 controls) did not support an association with PDS. We also did not confirm a link between PMEL and PDS in our cohorts due to lack of reported mutations and similar frequency of the variants in PDS patients as in control subjects. Conclusions We did not detect a statistical enrichment of mutations in melanosome-related genes in human PDS patients and we found conflicting data about the likely pathogenicity of MRAP mutations. PDS may have a complex genetic basis that is not easily unraveled with exome analyses.